145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11475386)
1. Stability of patients' preferences for chemotherapy: the impact of experience.
Jansen SJ; Kievit J; Nooij MA; Stiggelbout AM
Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(4):295-306. PubMed ID: 11475386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unstable preferences: a shift in valuation or an effect of the elicitation procedure?
Jansen SJ; Stiggelbout AM; Wakker PP; Nooij MA; Noordijk EM; Kievit J
Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 10638538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patients' utilities for cancer treatments: a study of the chained procedure for the standard gamble and time tradeoff.
Jansen SJ; Stiggelbout AM; Wakker PP; Vliet Vlieland TP; Leer JW; Nooy MA; Kievit J
Med Decis Making; 1998; 18(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 10372581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
Groenvold M
Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stability of preferences with regard to adjuvant chemotherapy: impact of treatment decision, experience and the passing of time.
Jansen SJ; Otten W; Baas-Thijssen MC; VAN DE Velde CJ; Nortier HW; Stiggelbout AM
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2008 Jan; 17(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 18181895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do visual analogue scale (VAS) derived standard gamble (SG) utilities agree with Health Utilities Index utilities? A comparison of patient and community preferences for health status in rheumatoid arthritis patients.
Rashidi AA; Anis AH; Marra CA
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2006 Apr; 4():25. PubMed ID: 16626489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychosocial factors and patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer.
Duric VM; Butow PN; Sharpe L; Boyle F; Beith J; Wilcken NR; Heritier S; Coates AS; John Simes R; Stockler MR
Psychooncology; 2007 Jan; 16(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 16856128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities.
Bleichrodt H
Health Econ; 2002 Jul; 11(5):447-56. PubMed ID: 12112493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interpretation of health and vision utilities in low vision patients.
Malkin AG; Goldstein JE; Massof RW
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 89(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 22227913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: is treatment worthwhile?
Jansen SJ; Kievit J; Nooij MA; de Haes JC; Overpelt IM; van Slooten H; Maartense E; Stiggelbout AM
Br J Cancer; 2001 Jun; 84(12):1577-85. PubMed ID: 11401308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Examination of assumptions in using time tradeoff and standard gamble utilities in individuals with spinal cord injury.
Lin MR; Yu WY; Wang SC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Feb; 93(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 22289233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of health state utilities using community and patient preference weights derived from a survey of patients with HIV/AIDS.
Schackman BR; Goldie SJ; Freedberg KA; Losina E; Brazier J; Weinstein MC
Med Decis Making; 2002; 22(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 11833663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of individually assessed preference weights on the relationship between holistic utilities and nonpreference-based assessment.
Jansen SJ; Stiggelbout AM; Nooij MA; Kievit J
Qual Life Res; 2000; 9(5):541-57. PubMed ID: 11190009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
Noel CW; Lee DJ; Kong Q; Xu W; Simpson C; Brown D; Gilbert RW; Gullane PJ; Irish JC; Huang SH; O'Sullivan B; Goldstein DP; de Almeida JR
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug; 141(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 26204439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly women with breast cancer: patients' perspectives on information giving and decision making.
Harder H; Ballinger R; Langridge C; Ring A; Fallowfield LJ
Psychooncology; 2013 Dec; 22(12):2729-35. PubMed ID: 23813806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing patients' and their partners' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer.
Duric VM; Butow PN; Sharpe L; Heritier S; Boyle F; Beith J; Wilcken NR; Coates AS; Simes RJ; Stockler MR
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Aug; 72(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 18434070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preference-based measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in children with chronic musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs).
Brunner HI; Maker D; Grundland B; Young NL; Blanchette V; Stain AM; Feldman BM
Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(4):314-22. PubMed ID: 12926581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the preferences of patients with psoriasis. A quantitative, utility approach.
Zug KA; Littenberg B; Baughman RD; Kneeland T; Nease RF; Sumner W; O'Connor GT; Jones R; Morrison E; Cimis R
Arch Dermatol; 1995 May; 131(5):561-8. PubMed ID: 7741543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors affecting patients' perceptions of choice regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Jansen SJ; Otten W; Stiggelbout AM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Sep; 99(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 16541318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer in Taiwan.
Chou TC; Chiang SC; Ko Y
Breast; 2020 Jun; 51():57-64. PubMed ID: 32213442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
