239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11475489)
41. The Surprising Reach of FDA Regulation of Cannabis, Even After Descheduling.
O'Connor SM; Lietzan E
Am Univ Law Rev; 2019; 68(3):823-925. PubMed ID: 30919712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Admission of AIDS patients to the long-term care facility: protections under federal and Washington State law.
Roche RJ
Gonzaga Law Rev; 1988-1989; 24(1):85-106. PubMed ID: 11653893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. AIDS discrimination under federal, state, and local law after Arline.
Wasson RP
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1987; 15(2):221-78. PubMed ID: 11658972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The Pain Relief Promotion Act: Congress's misguided intervention into end-of-life care.
Buzzee SE
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 2001; 70(1):217-49. PubMed ID: 16389683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Should medical marijuana be legalized nationwide?
RN; 2006 Oct; 69(10):21-2. PubMed ID: 17069143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Jumping frogs, endangered toads, and California's medical-marijuana law.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2005 Nov; 353(21):2291-6. PubMed ID: 16306529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Voters in two States endorse medicinal marijuana.
AIDS Policy Law; 1996 Nov; 11(21):7. PubMed ID: 11364055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Medical marijuana: California update.
James JS
AIDS Treat News; 1996 Aug; (No 253):3-5. PubMed ID: 11363767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. High court hears arguments in medical marijuana case.
AIDS Policy Law; 2004 Dec; 19(22):7. PubMed ID: 15628008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The law of choice and choice of law: abortion, the right to travel, and extraterritorial regulation in American federalism.
Kreimer SF
N Y Univ Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 67(3):451-519. PubMed ID: 11656241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Who defines "legitimate medical practice?" Lessons learned from the Controlled Substances Act, physician-assisted suicide, and Oregon v. Ashcroft.
Gast S
Va J Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):261-91. PubMed ID: 16493846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The ethics of medical marijuana: government restrictions vs. medical necessity.
Clark PA
J Public Health Policy; 2000; 21(1):40-60. PubMed ID: 10754797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Behind Schedule - Reconciling Federal and State Marijuana Policy.
Haffajee RL; MacCoun RJ; Mello MM
N Engl J Med; 2018 Aug; 379(6):501-504. PubMed ID: 29996065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Buckman extended: federal preemption of state fraud-on-the-FDA statutes.
Gaddis CA
Food Drug Law J; 2014; 69(1):113-36, iii. PubMed ID: 24772688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Views on marijuana.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Apr; 14(7):12. PubMed ID: 11366508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Medicinal use of marijuana. Is the debate a smoke screen for movement toward legalization?
Crites-Leoni A
J Leg Med; 1998 Jun; 19(2):273-304. PubMed ID: 9658742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Supreme Court. State laws will not protect medical marijuana users.
AIDS Policy Law; 2005 Jul; 20(13):3. PubMed ID: 16041853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Constitutional law--health law--constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment--medically necessary abortions need not be funded by the state or federal government under Medicaid--Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980).
Brath MS
Whittier Law Rev; 1981; 3(3):381-408. PubMed ID: 11655629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Funding of medically-necessary abortions: a reexamination of U.S. law and a call for EC federalism.
Nishi J
Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1992; [1992]():517-38. PubMed ID: 11652961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Medical marijuana: the state of the research.
Mirken B
AIDS Treat News; 1996 Oct; (No 257):1-3. PubMed ID: 11363931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
