These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. [Results of aortic valve substitution with the Björk-Shiley prosthesis]. Astolfi D; Marcelletti C Arch Inst Cardiol Mex; 1973; 43(3):428-36. PubMed ID: 4804249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Early and late results following aortic valve replacement using a Starr-Edwards ball prosthesis]. Braun L; McGoon DC Thoraxchir Vask Chir; 1971 Dec; 19(6):468-77. PubMed ID: 5290535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Isolated replacement of the aortic valve with the Starr-Edwards prosthesis. A 9 year review. Barnhorst DA; Oxman HA; Connolly DC; Pluth JR; Danielson GK; Wallace RB; McGoon DC J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1975 Jul; 70(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 1152492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparative pre- and postoperative phonemchanograms in aortic valve diseases treated by implantation of a Starr-Edwards prosthesis. Apropos of 24 cases]. Longhini C; Etchegaray R; Bonetti P; Manini GL Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 1975; 24(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 1137328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and haemodynamic results of aortic valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis. Björk VO; Holmgren A; Olin C; Ovenfors CO Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1971; 5(3):177-91. PubMed ID: 5135701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Aortic valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis. Björk VO Br Heart J; 1971; 33(Suppl):Suppl:42-6. PubMed ID: 5572645 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve replacements]. Mühlberger V; Schistek R; Hopferwieser T; Schwaiger A; Scharfetter H; Knapp E Z Kardiol; 1986 Jun; 75(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 3751218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years. Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of different pressure gradients on late clinical outcome after aortic valve replacement. Hoffmann A; Haefeli R; Weiss P; Stultz P; Peter M; Gradel E; Burckhardt D J Heart Valve Dis; 1992 Sep; 1(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 1341223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The long-term evolution of aortic valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis: experience with the Starr-Edwards (1965-1974) and Bjork-Shiley (1973-1981) prostheses]. Braun S; Irarrázabal MJ; Corbalán R; Chamorro G; Dubernet J; Maturana G; Morán S; Larrain E; González R Rev Med Chil; 1990 Dec; 118(12):1355-61. PubMed ID: 2152668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aortic root enlargement with glycerol-preserved homologous dura mater patch during aortic valve replacement. Osinowo O; Ross JK; Monro JL Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Feb; 33(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 2579457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve]. Mudra H; Rudolph W Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Long-term results of the correction of 202 cases of aortic valve diseases by Starr-Edwards prosthesis]. Soulie P; Fouchard J; Valty J; Heulin A; Caramanian M; Degeorges M Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1970 Dec; 63(12):1688-702. PubMed ID: 4993649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]