These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11476400)

  • 1. Evidence, expertise and the emergency physician: doctors should anticipate legal reform in their expert evidence.
    Hitchcock T
    Emerg Med (Fremantle); 2001 Mar; 13(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 11476400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The adversarial court system and the expert medical witness: 'The truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth?'.
    Ryan M
    Emerg Med (Fremantle); 2003 Jun; 15(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 12786650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The expert witness in emergency medicine.
    Stankus JL; Sklar DP
    Ann Emerg Med; 2014 Jun; 63(6):731-5. PubMed ID: 24486099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) and expert testimony.
    Kulich R; Maciewicz R; Scrivani SJ
    Pain Med; 2009 Mar; 10(2):373-80. PubMed ID: 19254335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expertise in law, medicine, and health care.
    Shuman DW
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2001 Apr; 26(2):267-90. PubMed ID: 11330081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The medical expert witness: time to regulate conflicts of interest.
    Donaldson L; Kaplan C; Leung WC
    Med Sci Law; 1999 Jan; 39(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 10087838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Emergency physicians as expert witnesses: 'from frontline wise to courtroom woes'.
    Cunningham NY
    Emerg Med Australas; 2009 Dec; 21(6):503-9. PubMed ID: 20002722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expert witness testimony: the ethics of being a medical expert witness.
    Andrew LB
    Emerg Med Clin North Am; 2006 Aug; 24(3):715-31. PubMed ID: 16877139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judicial gatekeeping and the social construction of the admissibility of expert testimony.
    Merlino ML; Murray CI; Richardson JT
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(2):187-206. PubMed ID: 18344168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A report of an accident investigation commission as evidence in legal proceedings].
    Widła T; Leśniak M
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2011; 61(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 22117493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expert scientific evidence under the adversarial system. A travesty of justice?
    Havard JD
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1992; 32(3):225-35. PubMed ID: 1431800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A proactive, data-based determination of the standard of medical care in pediatrics.
    Meadow W; Lantos J
    Pediatrics; 1998 Apr; 101(4):E6. PubMed ID: 9741980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expert evidence: do you have all the facts?
    Pamplin C
    Accid Emerg Nurs; 2000 Jul; 8(3):134-7. PubMed ID: 10893554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk assessment in the law: legal admissibility, scientific validity, and some disparities between research and practice.
    Krauss DA; Scurich N
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 23613165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
    Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of the Daubert case on modern litigation.
    Mavroforou A; Michalodimitrakis E
    Med Law; 2008 Dec; 27(4):755-65. PubMed ID: 19202854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The physician expert witness and the U.S. Supreme court--an epidemiologic approach.
    Norton ML
    Med Law; 2002; 21(3):435-49. PubMed ID: 12437195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medical and scientific organizations and scientific evidence in U.S. trials: lessons from European legal theory.
    Deftos LJ
    Acad Med; 1999 Mar; 74(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 10099641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Admissibility of scientific evidence post-Daubert.
    Masten J; Strzelczyk JJ
    Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 11725886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.