207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11477112)
1. Benchmarking and the laboratory.
Galloway M; Nadin L
J Clin Pathol; 2001 Aug; 54(8):590-7. PubMed ID: 11477112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Notification of critical results: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 121 institutions.
Valenstein PN; Wagar EA; Stankovic AK; Walsh MK; Schneider F
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Dec; 132(12):1862-7. PubMed ID: 19061281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benchmarking in pathology: development of a benchmarking complexity unit and associated key performance indicators.
Neil A; Pfeffer S; Burnett L;
Pathology; 2013 Jan; 45(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23222245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in emergency department turnaround time performance from 1990 to 1993. A comparison of two College of American Pathologists Q-probes studies.
Steindel SJ; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Oct; 121(10):1031-41. PubMed ID: 9341581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospital nursing satisfaction with clinical laboratory services: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 162 institutions.
Jones BA; Walsh MK; Ruby SG
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Dec; 130(12):1756-61. PubMed ID: 17149946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Q-Probes studies in anatomic pathology: quality improvement through targeted benchmarking.
Tworek JA; Volmar KE; McCall SJ; Bashleben CP; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Sep; 138(9):1156-66. PubMed ID: 25171698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Twenty-five years of accomplishments of the College of American Pathologists Q-probes program for clinical pathology.
Howanitz PJ; Perrotta PL; Bashleben CP; Meier FA; Ramsey GE; Massie LW; Zimmerman RL; Karcher DS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Sep; 138(9):1141-9. PubMed ID: 25171696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pathology department accreditation in the United Kingdom: a synopsis. Advisory Task Force on Standards to the Audit Steering Committee of the Royal College of Pathologists.
J Clin Pathol; 1991 Oct; 44(10):798-802. PubMed ID: 1960211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Q-tracks: a College of American Pathologists program of continuous laboratory monitoring and longitudinal tracking.
Zarbo RJ; Jones BA; Friedberg RC; Valenstein PN; Renner SW; Schifman RB; Walsh MK; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2002 Sep; 126(9):1036-44. PubMed ID: 12204052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assurance measurements in departments of pathology and laboratory medicine.
Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Nov; 114(11):1131-5. PubMed ID: 2241522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resource utilization and outcomes management: opportunities for the entrepreneurial pathologist.
Vance RP
Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1997; 11(5):318-21. PubMed ID: 10175174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is clinical pathology accreditation worth it? A survey of CPA-accredited laboratories.
Gough LA; Reynolds TM
Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 2000; 8(4):195-201. PubMed ID: 11189081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Royal College of Pathologists' United Kingdom pilot study of laboratory accreditation. The College Accreditation Steering Committee.
J Clin Pathol; 1990 Feb; 43(2):89-91. PubMed ID: 2318998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detecting and preventing the occurrence of errors in the practices of laboratory medicine and anatomic pathology: 15 years' experience with the College of American Pathologists' Q-PROBES and Q-TRACKS programs.
Novis DA
Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):965-78. PubMed ID: 15555751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benchmarking in pathology: development of an activity-based costing model.
Burnett L; Wilson R; Pfeffer S; Lowry J;
Pathology; 2012 Dec; 44(7):644-53. PubMed ID: 23149379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Polish Society of Pathologists certification rules for pathology departments/laboratories].
Pol J Pathol; 2004; 55(3):41-4. PubMed ID: 15619981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Intralaboratory performance and laboratorians' expectations for stat turnaround times. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of four cerebrospinal fluid determinations.
Howanitz PJ; Steindel SJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1991 Oct; 115(10):977-83. PubMed ID: 1898244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Customer satisfaction in anatomic pathology. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 3065 physician surveys from 94 laboratories.
Zarbo RJ; Nakhleh RE; Walsh M;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Jan; 127(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12521362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interinstitutional comparison of surgical biopsy diagnosis turnaround time: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 5384 surgical biopsies in 157 small hospitals.
Novis DA; Zarbo RJ; Saladino AJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 122(11):951-6. PubMed ID: 9822122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic 'errors' in anatomical pathology: relevance to Australian laboratories.
Leong AS; Braye S; Bhagwandeen B
Pathology; 2006 Dec; 38(6):490-7. PubMed ID: 17393975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
