These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11477306)

  • 1. Regional bone mass measurement from whole-body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scan.
    Hammami M; Koo MW; Koo WW; Thomas RT; Rakhman D
    J Clin Densitom; 2001; 4(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 11477306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and precision of bone mineral density and bone mineral content in excised rat humeri using fan beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Kastl S; Sommer T; Klein P; Hohenberger W; Engelke K
    Bone; 2002 Jan; 30(1):243-6. PubMed ID: 11792592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technical considerations for fan-beam dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in pediatric studies.
    Hammami M; Koo WW; Hockman EM
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2004; 28(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 15449572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of bone mass and body composition measurements in small subjects with pencil beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2004 Feb; 23(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 14963057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of fan beam dual energy x-ray absorptiometry to measure body composition of piglets.
    Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
    J Nutr; 2002 Jun; 132(6):1380-3. PubMed ID: 12042462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in small subjects: influence of dual-energy X-ray equipment on assessment of mineralization and body composition in newborn piglets.
    Picaud JC; Nyamugabo K; Braillon P; Lapillonne A; Claris O; Delmas P; Meunier P; Salle B; Rigo J
    Pediatr Res; 1999 Dec; 46(6):772-7. PubMed ID: 10590038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lumbar spine bone measurements in infants: whole-body vs lumbar spine dual X-ray absorptiometry scans.
    Zia-Ullah M; Koo WW; Hammami M
    J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 11940725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone mineral density of opposing hips using dual energy X-Ray absorptiometry in single-beam and fan-beam design.
    Franck H; Munz M; Scherrer M
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1997 Dec; 61(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 9383269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of accuracy and precision of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for infants.
    Koo WW; Massom LR; Walters J
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1111-5. PubMed ID: 7484287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in piglets.
    Chauhan S; Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2003 Oct; 22(5):408-14. PubMed ID: 14559933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hologic QDR 2000 whole-body scans: a comparison of three combinations of scan modes and analysis software.
    Spector E; LeBlanc A; Shackelford L
    Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(6):440-5. PubMed ID: 8695965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interchangeability of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in piglets and infants.
    Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2003 Aug; 78(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 12885703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone and body composition measurements of small subjects: discrepancies from software for fan-beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Koo WW; Hammami M; Shypailo RJ; Ellis KJ
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2004 Dec; 23(6):647-50. PubMed ID: 15637212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical considerations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based bone mineral measurements for pediatric studies.
    Koo WW; Walters J; Bush AJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Dec; 10(12):1998-2004. PubMed ID: 8619381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DXA for bone density measurement in small rats weighing 150-250 grams.
    Lu PW; Briody JN; Howman-Giles R; Trube A; Cowell CT
    Bone; 1994; 15(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 8086238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in small subjects: conditions affecting clinical measurements.
    Koo WW; Hockman EM; Hammami M
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2004 Jun; 23(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 15190045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of fan-beam DXA measurements in adults and phantoms.
    Ellis KJ; Shypailo RS; Steinberg FM; Lewis RD; Young RL; Wong WW
    J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 15618602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement--comparison of a single-beam and fan-beam design: the effect of osteophytic calcification on spine bone mineral density.
    Franck H; Munz M; Scherrer M
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1995 Mar; 56(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 7750022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The accuracy and precision of DXA for assessing body composition in team sport athletes.
    Bilsborough JC; Greenway K; Opar D; Livingstone S; Cordy J; Coutts AJ
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(19):1821-8. PubMed ID: 24914773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in small rats with low bone mineral density.
    Petersen MM; Nielsen PK; Lewin E; Olgaard K
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2000 Dec; 67(6):455-9. PubMed ID: 11289694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.