295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11477983)
1. Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.
Carlson KA; Russo JE
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Jun; 7(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 11477983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of rehabilitative voir dire on juror bias and decision making.
Crocker CB; Kovera MB
Law Hum Behav; 2010 Jun; 34(3):212-26. PubMed ID: 19644740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Understanding pretrial publicity: predecisional distortion of evidence by mock jurors.
Hope L; Memon A; McGeorge P
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Jun; 10(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 15222805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chaos in the courtroom reconsidered: emotional bias and juror nullification.
Horowitz IA; Kerr NL; Park ES; Gockel C
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):163-81. PubMed ID: 16786405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Town vs. gown: a direct comparison of community residents and student mock jurors.
Hosch HM; Culhane SE; Tubb VA; Granillo EA
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):452-66. PubMed ID: 21351133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deconstructing the simplification of jury instructions: How simplifying the features of complexity affects jurors' application of instructions.
Baguley CM; McKimmie BM; Masser BM
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Jun; 41(3):284-304. PubMed ID: 28182459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Constructing insanity: jurors' prototypes, attitudes, and legal decision-making.
Louden JE; Skeem JL
Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):449-70. PubMed ID: 17506086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of jury deliberations on jurors' propensity to disregard inadmissible evidence.
London K; Nunez N
J Appl Psychol; 2000 Dec; 85(6):932-9. PubMed ID: 11125657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The potentially biasing effects of voir dire in juvenile waiver cases.
Greathouse SM; Sothmann FC; Levett LM; Kovera MB
Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):427-39. PubMed ID: 20936334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions.
Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of mood and emotion on juror processing and judgments.
Semmler C; Brewer N
Behav Sci Law; 2002; 20(4):423-36. PubMed ID: 12210977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of acknowledging mock jurors' feelings on affective and cognitive biases: it depends on the sample.
McCabe JG; Krauss DA
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):331-57. PubMed ID: 21766326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When jurors' moral judgments result in jury nullification: moral outrage at the law as a mediator of euthanasia attitudes on verdicts.
Peter-Hagene LC; Ratliff CL
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(1):27-49. PubMed ID: 34552378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Where There's Smoke, There's Fire: the Effect of Truncated Testimony on Juror Decision-making.
Anderson L; Gross J; Sonne T; Zajac R; Hayne H
Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):200-17. PubMed ID: 26879737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A third verdict option: exploring the impact of the not proven verdict on mock juror decision making.
Hope L; Greene E; Memon A; Gavisk M; Houston K
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):241-52. PubMed ID: 17703354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
