149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11478090)
41. Surrogate decision making for mentally incapacitated adults.
Nelson LJ; Golenski JD
Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Feb-Mar-Apr; 1(2 3 & 4):1-28. PubMed ID: 11650108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Living wills in the United States and Canada: a comparative analysis.
Steinle SJ
Case West Reserve J Int Law; 1992; 24(2):435-73. PubMed ID: 11652678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Advance care planning: Beyond the living will.
Messinger-Rapport BJ; Baum EE; Smith ML
Cleve Clin J Med; 2009 May; 76(5):276-85. PubMed ID: 19414542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Legal trends in bioethics.
Fry-Revere S
J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 11642918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Empirical assessment of a research advance directive for persons with dementia and their proxies.
Stocking CB; Hougham GW; Danner DD; Patterson MB; Whitehouse PJ; Sachs GA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2007 Oct; 55(10):1609-12. PubMed ID: 17714461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Health care information technology and informed consent: computers and the doctor-patient relationship.
Miller FH
Indiana Law Rev; 1998; 31(4):1019-42. PubMed ID: 11660668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The values history: an innovation in surrogate medical decision-making.
Lambert P; Gibson JM; Nathanson P
Pa Nurse; 1991 Mar; 46(3):16, 18-21. PubMed ID: 1866178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Proxy consent to organ donation by incompetents.
Morley MT
Yale Law J; 2002 Mar; 111(5):1215-49. PubMed ID: 11928746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Precommitment issues in bioethics.
Robertson JA
Tex Law Rev; 2003 Jun; 81(7):1849-76. PubMed ID: 15478266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Compelling pregnancy at death's door.
Taylor KA
Columbia J Gend Law; 1997; 7(1):85-165. PubMed ID: 16184655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Deciding for others: surrogate decision making for incompetent adults.
Brock DW
R I Med J (1976); 1991 Mar; 74(3):105-11. PubMed ID: 2038644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Legal and ethical considerations of "living will".
Huilgol N
Issues Med Ethics; 1996; 4(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 15125415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [Abuse is not excluded. The new regulation applies also without patient advance directives! (interview by Dr. med. Horst Gross)].
Tolmein O
MMW Fortschr Med; 2009 Aug; 151(34-35):18. PubMed ID: 19771782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Decisions for the dying: an empirical study of physicians' responses to advance directives.
Zinberg JM
Vt Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):445-91. PubMed ID: 11653869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Anderson v. St. Francis-St. George Hospital: wrongful living from an American and Jewish legal perspective.
Pollack D; Steinmetz C; Lens V
Clevel State Law Rev; 1997; 45(4):621-37. PubMed ID: 11660802
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The right to die in Montana: the Montana Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act.
Hunt WE
Mont Law Rev; 1993; 54(2):339-56. PubMed ID: 16180290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Forensic nursing implications for organ and tissue transplantation.
Dougherty C
Crit Care Nurs Q; 2008; 31(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 18574372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Living will statutes: the first decade.
Gelfand G
Wis L Rev; 1987; 5(5):737-822. PubMed ID: 11650367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Hungarian physicians' attitudes toward advance directives.
Blasszauer B; Jakab T; Csanaky A
Bull Med Ethics; 1997 Mar; (126):13-6. PubMed ID: 16127836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. First person consent: OPOs across the country are adapting to the change.
Sokohl K
UNOS Update; 2002; ():1, 3. PubMed ID: 15460622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
