These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing. Reflections and Recommendations. Parens E; Asch A Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(5):S1-22. PubMed ID: 10587809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Disability community and identity: perceptions of prenatal screening. Kaplan D; Saxton M Genewatch; 1999 Apr; 12(2):4, 6-8. PubMed ID: 12199297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Remarks on prenatal diagnosis - National Swedish Social Welfare Board Memo 1982:27]. Lindqvist B; Holmegard J; Wiberg M Jordemodern; 1983 Dec; 96(12):350-3. PubMed ID: 6230341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Important to test, important to support": attitudes toward disability rights and prenatal diagnosis among leaders of support groups for genetic disorders in Israel. Raz A Soc Sci Med; 2004 Nov; 59(9):1857-66. PubMed ID: 15312920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mother matters: a fresh look at prenatal genetic testing. Lippman A Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 11653996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Childbearing in the age of biotechnology. Hubbard R Genewatch; 2001 Jul; 14(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 12814107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioethics and the law--the impact of genetic technology on prenatal management. McGivern B E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E9. PubMed ID: 16969924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prenatal diagnosis. An earlier look at baby's genes. Kaiser J Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5740):1476-8. PubMed ID: 16141041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Disability equality and prenatal testing: contradictory or compatible? Asch A Fla State Univ Law Rev; 2003; 30(2):315-42. PubMed ID: 15083833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "I can feel it -- my baby is healthy": women's experiences with prenatal diagnosis in Switzerland. Leuzinger M; Rambert B Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 11650397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A voice for people with disabilities in the prenatal screening debate. Bricher G Nurs Inq; 1999 Mar; 6(1):65-7. PubMed ID: 10647402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Junior comes out perfect. Kitcher P N Y Times Mag; 1996 Sep; ():124-6. PubMed ID: 11647168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A threat to disabled persons? On the genetics approach to developmental disabilities. Reinders HS Bioethics Forum; 1996; 12(3):3-10. PubMed ID: 11660307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: reflections and recommendations. Parens E; Asch A Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 2003; 9(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 12587137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Japanese university approves genetic tests on in vitro embryos. Saegusa A Nature; 1999 Feb; 397(6719):461. PubMed ID: 10028960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Narrative portrayals of genes and human flourishing. Kalbian AH; Shepherd L Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):W15-W21. PubMed ID: 14744311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Choice in prenatal testing. Lippman A Genewatch; 1999 Apr; 12(2):1, 3-4. PubMed ID: 12199294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Couple screening to avoid thalassemia: successful in Iran and instructive for us. Haddow JE J Med Screen; 2005; 12(2):55-6. PubMed ID: 15949113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Early discovery of birth defects. Gastonguay PR America (NY); 1973 Sep; 129(9):218. PubMed ID: 11664252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]