99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1147850)
21. Masking level difference: a measure of auditory processing capability.
Goldstein DP; Stephens SD
Audiology; 1975; 14(4):354-67. PubMed ID: 1096867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A critique of speech recognition testing preliminary to hearing therapy.
Schultz MC
J Speech Hear Disord; 1972 May; 37(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 5027358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. An investigation of the efficacy of transdermal therapy on sensori-neural hypacusis.
Brooks SA; Harrison RJ
Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 1092039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Time resolution ability in dichotic hearing experiments (author's transl)].
von Wedel H
Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1978 Nov; 219(2):419-20. PubMed ID: 749877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Auditory localization and its clinical applications.
Tonning FM
Audiology; 1975; 14(4):368-80. PubMed ID: 1096868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Estimating speech threshold from the PI-PB function.
Jerger S; Jerger J
Arch Otolaryngol; 1976 Aug; 102(8):487-96. PubMed ID: 942326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Threshold of octave masking as a predictor of temporary threshold shift following repeated noise exposure.
Chermak GD; Dengerink JE; Dengerink HA
J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 Aug; 49(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 6748625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A test-retest reliability study on clinical measurement of masking level differences.
Stubblefield JH; Goldstein DP
Audiology; 1977; 16(5):419-31. PubMed ID: 901296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Frequency modulated tone thresholds in normal and abnormally adapting ears.
Young IM; Harbert F
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1970 Feb; 79(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 5415599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Laboratory methods of assessing hearing loss.
Møller AR
Environ Health Perspect; 1982 Apr; 44():87-92. PubMed ID: 7084154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Use of heart rate response for the assessment of hearing in infants.
Suzuki T
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1978; 87(2 Pt 1):243-7. PubMed ID: 646295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Relationship of auditory distortion test results to speech discrimination through flat vs. selective amplifying systems.
Thompson G; Lassman F
J Speech Hear Res; 1969 Sep; 12(3):594-606. PubMed ID: 5811850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Noise hazard meter.
Botsford JH
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1971 Feb; 32(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 5572574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Tuning fork decay.
Miller GW
Laryngoscope; 1979 Mar; 89(3):459-72. PubMed ID: 431250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [On the testing of the difference limen of intensity (author's transl)].
Fritze W
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1977 Nov; 56(11):919-21. PubMed ID: 145528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Earmold modification effect measured by coupler, threshold and probe techniques.
Studebaker GA; Cox RM; Wark DJ
Audiology; 1978; 17(2):173-86. PubMed ID: 646735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A clinical test battery for obscure auditory dysfunction (OAD): development, selection and use of tests.
Saunders GH; Field DL; Haggard MP
Br J Audiol; 1992 Feb; 26(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 1586847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Frequency discrimination for bands of noise.
Gabrielsson A; Johansson B; Lindblad AC; Persson L; Pettersson A; Rosenqvist B
Audiology; 1975; 14(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 1147841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Rinne test modified to quantify hearing.
Vaswani R; Parikh L; Udochi N; Vaswani SK
South Med J; 2008 Jan; 101(1):107-8. PubMed ID: 18176307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Application of a response duration schedule in rats to evaluate drug-induced auditory impairment (author's transl)].
Kameyama T; Nabeshima T; Takahashi K
Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi; 1978 Apr; 74(3):419-26. PubMed ID: 669486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
