These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11478546)

  • 1. Declining the offer of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for bowel cancer: a qualitative investigation of the decision-making process.
    McCaffery K; Borril J; Williamson S; Taylor T; Sutton S; Atkin W; Wardle J
    Soc Sci Med; 2001 Sep; 53(5):679-91. PubMed ID: 11478546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concerns, perceived need and competing priorities: a qualitative exploration of decision-making and non-participation in a population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme to prevent colorectal cancer.
    Hall N; Birt L; Rees CJ; Walter FM; Elliot S; Ritchie M; Weller D; Rubin G
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e012304. PubMed ID: 27836872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acceptability of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in older adults in the United Kingdom.
    Taylor T; Williamson S; Wardle J; Borrill J; Sutton S; Atkin W
    J Med Screen; 2000; 7(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 10807146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acceptance of flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening examination for colorectal cancer in an outpatient clinic.
    Gölder S; Vogt W; Lichti H; Rath HC; Kullmann A; Schölmerich J; Kullmann F
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2007 Apr; 22(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 16819639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emotional predictors of bowel screening: the avoidance-promoting role of fear, embarrassment, and disgust.
    Reynolds LM; Bissett IP; Consedine NS
    BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):518. PubMed ID: 29720112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: patient attitudes and compliance.
    McCarthy BD; Moskowitz MA
    J Gen Intern Med; 1993 Mar; 8(3):120-5. PubMed ID: 8455106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Barriers to flexible sigmoidoscopy colorectal cancer screening in low uptake socio-demographic groups: A systematic review.
    Travis E; Ashley L; Pownall M; O'Connor DB
    Psychooncology; 2020 Aug; 29(8):1237-1247. PubMed ID: 32539187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acceptance of screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy.
    Cockburn J; Thomas RJ; McLaughlin SJ; Reading D
    J Med Screen; 1995; 2(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 7497160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of endoscopic procedures for colorectal cancer screening in women with mammography and Pap smear.
    Nicholson FB; Korman MG
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2004 Sep; 60(3):400-7. PubMed ID: 15332031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attitudes to colorectal cancer screening among ethnic minority groups in the UK.
    Robb KA; Solarin I; Power E; Atkin W; Wardle J
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():34. PubMed ID: 18221519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Colorectal cancer: a survey of community beliefs and behaviours in Victoria.
    Thomas RJ; Clarke VA
    Med J Aust; 1998 Jul; 169(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 9695701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acceptability and side-effects of colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in a screening setting.
    Senore C; Ederle A; Fantin A; Andreoni B; Bisanti L; Grazzini G; Zappa M; Ferrero F; Marutti A; Giuliani O; Armaroli P; Segnan N
    J Med Screen; 2011; 18(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 22045821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acceptance of flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy for screening and surveillance in colorectal cancer prevention.
    Nicholson FB; Korman MG
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 15949120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reasons for non-participation in the Northern Ireland Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study.
    Bradley DT; Treanor C; McMullan C; Owen T; Graham A; Anderson D
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008266. PubMed ID: 26353870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gender differences in attitudes impeding colorectal cancer screening.
    Ritvo P; Myers RE; Paszat L; Serenity M; Perez DF; Rabeneck L
    BMC Public Health; 2013 May; 13():500. PubMed ID: 23706029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical applications.
    Walsh JM; Terdiman JP
    JAMA; 2003 Mar; 289(10):1297-302. PubMed ID: 12633192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mass population screening for colorectal cancer: factors influencing subjects' choice of screening test.
    Frew E; Wolstenholme J; Whynes D
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2001 Apr; 6(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 11357249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primary care physicians' decisions to perform flexible sigmoidoscopy.
    Lewis JD; Asch DA; Ginsberg GG; Hoops TC; Kochman ML; Bilker WB; Strom BL
    J Gen Intern Med; 1999 May; 14(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 10337039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient-reported outcomes following flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer in a demonstration screening programme in the UK.
    Robb KA; Lo SH; Power E; Kralj-Hans I; Edwards R; Vance M; von Wagner C; Atkin W; Wardle J
    J Med Screen; 2012 Dec; 19(4):171-6. PubMed ID: 23486697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploratory study examining barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening.
    Paddison JS; Yip MJ
    Aust J Rural Health; 2010 Feb; 18(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 20136809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.