These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11479439)
1. [Geometrical analysis of benign and malignant breast lesions]. Grizzi F; Muzzio PC; Di Maggio A; Dioguardi N Radiol Med; 2001 Jun; 101(6):432-5. PubMed ID: 11479439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fractal analysis of mammographic lesions: a feasibility study quantifying the difference between benign and malignant masses. Velanovich V Am J Med Sci; 1996 May; 311(5):211-4. PubMed ID: 8615395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Limitations in distinguishing malignant from benign lesions of the breast by systematic review of mammograms. Monostori Z; Herman PG; Carmody DP; Eacobacci TM; Capece NR; Cruz VM; Gentin S; Vernace FM Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Dec; 173(6):438-42. PubMed ID: 1948599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative classification of breast tumors in digitized mammograms. Pohlman S; Powell KA; Obuchowski NA; Chilcote WA; Grundfest-Broniatowski S Med Phys; 1996 Aug; 23(8):1337-45. PubMed ID: 8873030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of malignant and benign breast lesions with an automated US system: results in 120 cases. Richter K; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Winzer KJ; Schmitt KJ; Prihoda H; Frohberg HD; Guski H; Gregor P; Blohmer JU; Fobbe F; Döinghaus K; Löhr G; Hamm B Radiology; 1997 Dec; 205(3):823-30. PubMed ID: 9393543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of the primary diagnosis with a CAD-system in mammography]. Malich A; Vogel D; Facius M; Marx C; Freesmeyer MG; Sauner D; Hansch A; Pfleiderer SO; Fleck M; Kaiser WA Rofo; 2003 Sep; 175(9):1225-31. PubMed ID: 12964078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wavelet-based 3D reconstruction of microcalcification clusters from two mammographic views: new evidence that fractal tumors are malignant and Euclidean tumors are benign. Batchelder KA; Tanenbaum AB; Albert S; Guimond L; Kestener P; Arneodo A; Khalil A PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e107580. PubMed ID: 25222610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [99mTc-MIBI characterization of breast microcalcifications. Correlations with scintigraphic and histopathologic findings]. Vanoli C; Antronaco R; Giovanella L; Ceriani L; Sessa F; Fugazzola C Radiol Med; 1999; 98(1-2):19-25. PubMed ID: 10566292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Morphometry by analysis of microcalcifications and histopathological diagnosis: a new approach to the diagnosis of impalpable lesions of the breast detected by mammography]. Charpin C; Garcia S Bull Acad Natl Med; 1995 Oct; 179(7):1517-31; discussion 1532-7. PubMed ID: 8556425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions. Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers. Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonographic differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions: value of indirect measurement of ultrasound velocity. Richter K; Heywang-Köbrunner SH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):825-31. PubMed ID: 7676975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis. Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 11811828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A quantitative analysis of the spatial relationships of grouped microcalcifications demonstrated on xeromammography in benign and malignant breast disease. Hansell DM; Cooke JC; Parsons CA; Evans SH; Dance DR; Bliss JM; Llesley I Br J Radiol; 1988 Jan; 61(721):21-5. PubMed ID: 2832028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses. Varela C; Timp S; Karssemeijer N Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):425-41. PubMed ID: 16394348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast biopsy: a comparative study of stereotaxically guided core and excisional techniques. Gisvold JJ; Goellner JR; Grant CS; Donohue JH; Sykes MW; Karsell PR; Coffey SL; Jung SH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):815-20. PubMed ID: 8140997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic features of nonpalpable spiculated lesions. Demirkazik FB; Gülsün M; Firat P Clin Imaging; 2003; 27(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 12932677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic and histologic correlations of microcalcifications. de Paredes ES; Abbitt PL; Tabbarah S; Bickers MA; Smith DC Radiographics; 1990 Jul; 10(4):577-89. PubMed ID: 2377764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microcalcification morphological descriptors and parenchyma fractal dimension hierarchically interact in breast cancer: A diagnostic perspective. Verma G; Luciani ML; Palombo A; Metaxa L; Panzironi G; Pediconi F; Giuliani A; Bizzarri M; Todde V Comput Biol Med; 2018 Feb; 93():1-6. PubMed ID: 29247886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]