These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11479439)

  • 21. [Fractal analysis in the diagnosis of breast tumors].
    Crişan DA; Lesaru M; Dobrescu R; Vasilescu C
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2007; 102(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 17410726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Value of contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography using a microbubble echo-enhancing agent in evaluation of small breast lesions.
    Kook SH; Kwag HJ
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2003 Jun; 31(5):227-38. PubMed ID: 12767017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Computer-aided preoperative diagnosis of microcalcifications on mammograms.
    Kouskos E; Markopoulos C; Revenas K; Koufopoulos K; Kyriakou V; Gogas J
    Acta Radiol; 2003 Jan; 44(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12630997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bayesian network to predict breast cancer risk of mammographic microcalcifications and reduce number of benign biopsy results: initial experience.
    Burnside ES; Rubin DL; Fine JP; Shachter RD; Sisney GA; Leung WK
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):666-73. PubMed ID: 16926323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Classification of breast ultrasound images using fractal feature.
    Chen DR; Chang RF; Chen CJ; Ho MF; Kuo SJ; Chen ST; Hung SJ; Moon WK
    Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 15967313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Segmentation and numerical analysis of microcalcifications on mammograms using mathematical morphology.
    Betal D; Roberts N; Whitehouse GH
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Sep; 70(837):903-17. PubMed ID: 9486066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Computational growth model of breast microcalcification clusters in simulated mammographic environments.
    Plourde SM; Marin Z; Smith ZR; Toner BC; Batchelder KA; Khalil A
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Sep; 76():7-13. PubMed ID: 27380025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification.
    Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM; Wolverton DE; Metz CE; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Vyborny CJ; Doi K
    Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 8628853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of independent double readings and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for the diagnosis of breast calcifications.
    Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM; Schmidt RA; Metz CE
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 16399036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving the distinction between benign and malignant breast lesions: the value of sonographic texture analysis.
    Garra BS; Krasner BH; Horii SC; Ascher S; Mun SK; Zeman RK
    Ultrason Imaging; 1993 Oct; 15(4):267-85. PubMed ID: 8171752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Unusual breast lesions: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
    Feder JM; de Paredes ES; Hogge JP; Wilken JJ
    Radiographics; 1999 Oct; 19 Spec No():S11-26; quiz S260. PubMed ID: 10517440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computer-aided detection of amorphous calcifications.
    Soo MS; Rosen EL; Xia JQ; Ghate S; Baker JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):887-92. PubMed ID: 15728613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 mammograms and the use of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a nonacademic community practice.
    Mendez A; Cabanillas F; Echenique M; Malekshamran K; Perez I; Ramos E
    Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 14770425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: radiological and pathological correlations.
    Kettritz U; Morack G; Decker T
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 16036159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Characterization of benign and malignant breast lesions with computed tomography laser mammography (CTLM): initial experience.
    Floery D; Helbich TH; Riedl CC; Jaromi S; Weber M; Leodolter S; Fuchsjaeger MH
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jun; 40(6):328-35. PubMed ID: 15905718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fractal dimension in aspiration cytology smears of breast and cervical lesions.
    Ohri S; Dey P; Nijhawan R
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2004 Apr; 26(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 15131899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Classification of malignant and benign masses based on hybrid ART2LDA approach.
    Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Dec; 18(12):1178-87. PubMed ID: 10695530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fine needle aspiration cytology in the management of palpable benign and malignant breast disease. Correlation with clinical and mammographic findings.
    Langmuir VK; Cramer SF; Hood ME
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 2916375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Computer-aided segmentation, form analysis and classification of 2975 breast microcalcifications using 7-fold microfocus magnification mammography].
    Grunert JH; Khalifa R; Gmelin E
    Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1759-65. PubMed ID: 15573286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative evaluation of breast lesions with the help of impression smears, histopathology and mammography.
    Trivedi N; Khan N; Sherwani R; Verma AK; Ranga S; Talib VH
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1997 Jul; 40(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 9354007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.