BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11479863)

  • 1. Technical assessment of porcine enteroenterostomy performed with ZEUS robotic technology.
    Hollands CM; Dixey LN; Torma MJ
    J Pediatr Surg; 2001 Aug; 36(8):1231-3. PubMed ID: 11479863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Applications of robotic surgery in pediatric patients.
    Hollands CM; Dixey LN
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2002 Feb; 12(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 12008767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the DA Vinci and Zeus systems.
    Sung GT; Gill IS
    Urology; 2001 Dec; 58(6):893-8. PubMed ID: 11744453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic-assisted esophagoesophagostomy.
    Hollands CM; Dixey LN
    J Pediatr Surg; 2002 Jul; 37(7):983-5; discussion 983-5. PubMed ID: 12077754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Totally minimally invasive robot-assisted unstented pyeloplasty using the Zeus Microwrist Surgical System: an animal study.
    Lorincz A; Knight CG; Kant AJ; Langenburg SE; Rabah R; Gidell K; Dawe E; Klein MD; McLorie G
    J Pediatr Surg; 2005 Feb; 40(2):418-22. PubMed ID: 15750940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic pyeloplasty: experience with three robotic platforms.
    Nguan C; Kwan K; Al Omar M; Beasley KA; Luke PP
    Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3571-6. PubMed ID: 17594748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic vascular anastomoses: does robotic (Zeus-Aesop) assistance help to overcome the learning curve?
    Nio D; Bemelman WA; Balm R; Legemate DA
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Aug; 19(8):1071-6. PubMed ID: 16021377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does robotic assistance improve efficiency in performing complex minimally invasive surgical procedures?
    Jayaraman S; Quan D; Al-Ghamdi I; El-Deen F; Schlachta CM
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Mar; 24(3):584-8. PubMed ID: 19633893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective angiographic comparison of direct, endoscopic, and telesurgical approaches to harvesting the internal thoracic artery.
    Kiaii B; McClure RS; Stitt L; Rayman R; Dobkowski WB; Jablonsky G; Novick RJ; Boyd WD
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Aug; 82(2):624-8. PubMed ID: 16863775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic computer-assisted telemanipulation enhances coronary artery bypass.
    Shennib H; Bastawisy A; McLoughlin J; Moll F
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Feb; 117(2):310-3. PubMed ID: 9918973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The efficacy of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic vascular anastomoses in an experimental model.
    Nio D; Balm R; Maartense S; Guijt M; Bemelman WA
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2004 Mar; 27(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 14760597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early experience with robotic technology for coronary artery surgery.
    Boehm DH; Reichenspurner H; Gulbins H; Detter C; Meiser B; Brenner P; Habazettl H; Reichart B
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1999 Oct; 68(4):1542-6. PubMed ID: 10543565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and hand-sewn intestinal sutured anastomoses performed by residents.
    Marecik SJ; Chaudhry V; Jan A; Pearl RK; Park JJ; Prasad LM
    Am J Surg; 2007 Mar; 193(3):349-55; discussion 355. PubMed ID: 17320533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transfer of training in robotic-assisted microvascular surgery.
    Karamanoukian RL; Bui T; McConnell MP; Evans GR; Karamanoukian HL
    Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Dec; 57(6):662-5. PubMed ID: 17122554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotically assisted esophago-esophagostomy in newborn pigs.
    Lorincz A; Langenburg SE; Knight CG; Gidell K; Rabah R; Klein MD
    J Pediatr Surg; 2004 Sep; 39(9):1386-9. PubMed ID: 15359395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skill performance in open videoscopic surgery.
    Mohamed A; Rafiq A; Panait L; Lavrentyev V; Doarn CR; Merrell RC
    Surg Endosc; 2006 Aug; 20(8):1281-5. PubMed ID: 16865617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance measurements in endolaparoscopic infrarenal aortic graft implantation using computer-enhanced instrumentation: a laboratory model for training.
    Martinez BD; Wiegand CS; Mendez J
    JSLS; 2007; 11(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 17931515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotically assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis in a porcine model: a pilot study.
    Margossian H; Garcia-Ruiz A; Falcone T; Goldberg JM; Attaran M; Miller JH; Gagner M
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 1998 Apr; 8(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 9617965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical uterine horn anastomosis.
    Margossian H; Garcia-Ruiz A; Falcone T; Goldberg JM; Attaran M; Gagner M
    Fertil Steril; 1998 Sep; 70(3):530-4. PubMed ID: 9757885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems.
    Kakeji Y; Konishi K; Ieiri S; Yasunaga T; Nakamoto M; Tanoue K; Baba H; Maehara Y; Hashizume M
    Int J Med Robot; 2006 Dec; 2(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 17520647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.