These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11480712)

  • 1. Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy.
    Bergeron C; Bishop J; Lemarie A; Cas F; Ayivi J; Huynh B; Barrasso R
    Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11480712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears. Including initial biopsy results.
    Bishop JW; Bigner SH; Colgan TJ; Husain M; Howell LP; McIntosh KM; Taylor DA; Sadeghi MH
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 9479339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of thin-layer preparations vs. conventional Pap smears in a blinded, split-sample study. Extended cytologic evaluation.
    Hessling JJ; Raso DS; Schiffer B; Callicott J; Husain M; Taylor D
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):880-6. PubMed ID: 11725731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Papanicolaou and thin-layer cervical cytology with colposcopic biopsy control. A comparison.
    Harkness CB; Theofrastous JP; Ibrahim SN; Galvin SL; Lawrence HC
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Sep; 48(9):681-6. PubMed ID: 14562631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biopsy-based comparison of liquid-based, thin-layer preparations to conventional Pap smears.
    Vassilakos P; Schwartz D; de Marval F; Yousfi L; Broquet G; Mathez-Loic F; Campana A; Major A
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Jan; 45(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 10664941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preliminary assessment of the AutoCyte PREP. Direct-to-vial performance.
    Tench W
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):912-6. PubMed ID: 11127103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
    Heatley MK; Bury JP
    Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cytologic features of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions involving endocervical glands on thin-layer cytology.
    Selvaggi SM
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):689-90. PubMed ID: 16450913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of reading liquid based cytology slides using the ThinPrep Imager compared with conventional cytology: prospective study.
    Davey E; d'Assuncao J; Irwig L; Macaskill P; Chan SF; Richards A; Farnsworth A
    BMJ; 2007 Jul; 335(7609):31. PubMed ID: 17604301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AutoCyte Prep system vs. conventional cervical cytology. Comparison based on 2,156 cases.
    Minge L; Fleming M; VanGeem T; Bishop JW
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Mar; 45(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 10756493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applicability of liquid-based cytology to the assessment of DNA content in cervical lesions using static cytometry.
    Shirata NK; Longatto Filho A; Roteli-Martins C; Espoladore LM; Pittoli JE; Syrjänen K
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2003 Aug; 25(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 12961827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of cytological findings in abnormal cervical smears by cytohistologic comparison.
    Mostafa MG; Srivannaboon S; Rachanawutanon M
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2000 Jan; 43(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12583415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SpinThin, a simple, inexpensive technique for preparation of thin-layer cervical cytology from liquid-based specimens: data on 791 cases.
    Khalbuss WE; Rudomina D; Kauff ND; Chuang L; Melamed MR
    Cancer; 2000 Jun; 90(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 10896326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Liqui-Prep® versus conventional Papanicolaou smear to detect cervical cells abnormality by split-sample technique: a randomized double-blind controlled trial.
    Jesdapatarakul S; Tangjitgamol S; Nguansangiam S; Manusirivithaya S
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Jan; 39(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 20063407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears.
    Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical biopsy-based comparison of a new liquid-based thin-layer preparation with conventional Pap smears.
    Mattosinho de Castro Ferraz Mda G; Nicolau SM; Stávale JN; Focchi J; Castelo A; Dôres GB; Mielzynska-Lohnas I; Lorincz A; Rodrigues de Lima G
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):220-6. PubMed ID: 15048954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct-to-vial experience with AutoCyte PREP in a small New England regional cytology practice.
    Marino JF; Fremont-Smith M
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Apr; 46(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 11354836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in conventional cervical/vaginal smears and thin-layer preparations.
    Hecht JL; Sheets EE; Lee KR
    Cancer; 2002 Feb; 96(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11836696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cytologic and histologic review of atypical glandular cells (AGC) detected during cervical cytology screening.
    Jeng CJ; Liang HS; Wang TY; Shen J; Yang YC; Tzeng CR
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2003; 13(4):518-21. PubMed ID: 12911731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.