150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11480713)
1. Comparing the accuracy of ThinPrep Pap tests and conventional Papanicolaou smears on the basis of the histologic diagnosis: a clinical study of women with cervical abnormalities.
Park IA; Lee SN; Chae SW; Park KH; Kim JW; Lee HP
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 11480713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ThinPrep Pap Test: performance and biopsy follow-up in a university hospital.
Carpenter AB; Davey DD
Cancer; 1999 Jun; 87(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 10385440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of monolayered cervical smears in a gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait.
Luthra UK; Chishti M; Dey P; Jolly SV; Abdulla M; Das DK; Sugathan TN; Ajrawi MT; George J; George SS; Aziz AA; al-Juwaiser A; Karim FA; Mallik MK; Sheikh ZA; Khan S
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 11917577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical results of a split sample liquid-based cytology (ThinPrep) study of 4,322 patients in a Turkish institution.
Tuncer ZS; Başaran M; Sezgin Y; Firat P; Mocan Kuzey G
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2005; 26(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 16398228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Liqui-Prep® versus conventional Papanicolaou smear to detect cervical cells abnormality by split-sample technique: a randomized double-blind controlled trial.
Jesdapatarakul S; Tangjitgamol S; Nguansangiam S; Manusirivithaya S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Jan; 39(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 20063407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology.
Budge M; Halford J; Haran M; Mein J; Wright G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15904447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Liquid-based cervical cytologic smear study and conventional Papanicolaou smears: a metaanalysis of prospective studies comparing cytologic diagnosis and sample adequacy.
Bernstein SJ; Sanchez-Ramos L; Ndubisi B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Aug; 185(2):308-17. PubMed ID: 11518884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" be qualified? An assessment including comparison between conventional and liquid-based technologies.
Anton RC; Ramzy I; Schwartz MR; Younes P; Chakraborty S; Mody DR
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 93(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 11309773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ThinPrep Pap Test. Accuracy for glandular disease.
Ashfaq R; Gibbons D; Vela C; Saboorian MH; Iliya F
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 9987455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Thin-layer Pap test vs. conventional Pap smear. Analysis of 400 split samples.
Biscotti CV; O'Brien DL; Gero MA; Gramlich TL; Kennedy AW; Easley KA
J Reprod Med; 2002 Jan; 47(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11838315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cytohistologic correlation rates between conventional Papanicolaou smears and ThinPrep cervical cytology: a comparison.
Chacho MS; Mattie ME; Schwartz PE
Cancer; 2003 Jun; 99(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 12811853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Qualification of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in an independent laboratory: is it useful or significant?
Lachman MF; Cavallo-Calvanese C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Aug; 179(2):421-9. PubMed ID: 9731848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expression of p16INK4A in Pap smears containing atypical glandular cells from the uterine cervix.
Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Fu E
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 15098536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histologic follow-up of atypical endocervical cells. Liquid-based, thin-layer preparation vs. conventional Pap smear.
Wang N; Emancipator SN; Rose P; Rodriguez M; Abdul-Karim FW
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(3):453-7. PubMed ID: 12040636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations. A review of accumulated data.
Austin RM; Ramzy I
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):178-84. PubMed ID: 9479337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ThinPrep Processor. Clinical trials demonstrate an increased detection rate of abnormal cervical cytologic specimens.
Wilbur DC; Cibas ES; Merritt S; James LP; Berger BM; Bonfiglio TA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 8116577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ThinPrep Pap Test promotes detection of glandular lesions of the endocervix.
Bai H; Sung CJ; Steinhoff MM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jul; 23(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 10907926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of performance of conventional and ThinPrep gynecologic preparations in the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytology Program.
Renshaw AA; Young NA; Birdsong GG; Styer PE; Davey DD; Mody DR; Colgan TJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2004 Jan; 128(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 14692817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
