169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11480714)
1. Is it possible to define a better ASCUS class in cervicovaginal screening? A review of 187 cases.
Guerrini L; Sama D; Visani M; Cotignoli T; Sintoni C; Maioli P; Lanzanova G; Schincaglia P
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 11480714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histology correlation with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) cytology diagnoses: An argument to ensure ASCUS follow-up that is as aggressive as that for LSIL.
Dvorak KA; Finnemore M; Maksem JA
Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Oct; 21(4):292-5. PubMed ID: 10495326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cytologic predictors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with an ASCUS Pap smear.
Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(4):576-86. PubMed ID: 10934951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance.
Yang M; Zachariah S
J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):329-31. PubMed ID: 9219118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do qualifiers of ASCUS distinguish between low- and high-risk patients?
Malik SN; Wilkinson EJ; Drew PA; Bennett BB; Hardt NS
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 10349365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Qualifying the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" affects the predictive value of a squamous intraepithelial lesion on subsequent biopsy.
Genest DR; Dean B; Lee KR; Sheets E; Crum CP; Cibas ES
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):338-41. PubMed ID: 9648902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Unified methods for vaginal cytological diagnosis are required. Accuracy of the ASCUS respective CIN I compared].
Seidal T; Karakostova P
Lakartidningen; 2000 Feb; 97(8):826-8. PubMed ID: 10741022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rescreening of atypical cervicovaginal smears using PAPNET.
Lerma E; Colomo L; Carreras A; Esteva E; Quilez M; Prat J
Cancer; 1998 Dec; 84(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 9915138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: correlative histologic and follow-up studies from an academic medical center.
Williams ML; Rimm DL; Pedigo MA; Frable WJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Jan; 16(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 9034728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Pitman MB; Cibas ES; Powers CN; Renshaw AA; Frable WJ
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS): human papillomavirus testing, ASCUS subtyping,or follow-up cytology?
Hughes SA; Sun D; Gibson C; Bellerose B; Rushing L; Chen H; Harlow BL; Genest DR; Sheets EE; Crum CP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 186(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 11904597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ASCUS and AGUS criteria. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Solomon D; Frable WJ; Vooijs GP; Wilbur DC; Amma NS; Collins RJ; Davey DD; Knight BK; Luff RD; Meisels A; Navin J; Rosenthal DL; Sauer T; Stoler M; Suprun HZ; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 9479320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of cytologic screening results of the cervix.
Yalti S; Gürbüz B; Bilgiç R; Cakar Y; Eren S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(2):292-4. PubMed ID: 15823114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. From Papanicolaou to Bethesda: the rationale for a new cervical cytologic classification.
Kurman RJ; Malkasian GD; Sedlis A; Solomon D
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):779-82. PubMed ID: 1849626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical impact of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic comparison.
Lousuebsakul V; Knutsen SM; Gram IT; Akin MR
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 10667155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term follow-up of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS).
Emerson RE; Puzanov A; Brunnemer C; Younger C; Cramer H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Sep; 27(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 12203862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnosis and survey of abnormal/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a retrospective study.
Giudice A; Rizzo M; Rossi RT; Bonaffini O; Buda CA; Pettineo G
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(2B):1195-9. PubMed ID: 10810421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical implication of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance with or without favoring high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cervical smears.
ChangChien CC; Lin H; Eng HL; Chang WK
Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Dec; 22(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 10695204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears: follow-up study of an Asian screening population.
Cheung AN; Szeto EF; Ng KM; Fong KW; Yeung AC; Tsun OK; Khoo US; Chan KY; Ng AW
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 15098250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
