326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11481596)
1. What's new with institutional review boards?
Stone PW
Appl Nurs Res; 2001 Aug; 14(3):171-2. PubMed ID: 11481596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation: commentary.
Rosensaft J
Man Med; 1978; 3(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 10316738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation.
Himmelsbach CK; Sliwinski AJ; Lorber M; Mossman KL
Man Med; 1978; 3(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 10316736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Importance of local review committees (institutional review boards) for the protection of experimental subjects].
Rickels K
Monogr Gesamtgeb Psychiatr Psychiatry Ser; 1978; 19():94-112. PubMed ID: 714042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Institutional animal care and use committees.
Britt DP
ATLA Abstr; 1986 Mar; 13(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 11649839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Toward a more comprehensive approach to protecting human subjects: the interface of data safety monitoring boards and institutional review boards in randomized clinical trials.
Gordon VM; Sugarman J; Kass N
IRB; 1998; 20(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11655324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. When do the federal regulations allow placebo-controlled trials in children?
Miller FG; Wendler D; Wilfond B
J Pediatr; 2003 Feb; 142(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 12584527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Ethics committees: international experience and of the National Institute for cancer research of Genoa].
Sinaccio G; Robert E; Corda A; Dagnino G; Rosmino E; Gipponi M
Minerva Med; 1990 Dec; 81(12):869-73. PubMed ID: 2280878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A pilot project: bioethics consultants as non-voting members of IRBs at the National Institutes of Health.
DeRenzo EG; Wichman A
IRB; 1990; 12(6):6-8. PubMed ID: 11651266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Institutional review boards: consideration in developing countries.
Pape JW
Emerg Infect Dis; 2001; 7(3 Suppl):547. PubMed ID: 11485664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Protecting vulnerable research subjects: practical realities of institutional review board review and approval.
Wichman A
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 15573431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. More tales from institutional review boards.
Neuhauser D
Health Matrix Clevel; 1994; 4(1):153-8. PubMed ID: 10142174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bill of rights for research subjects.
Prentice ED; Reitemeier PJ; Antonson DL; Kelso TK; Jameton A
IRB; 1993; 15(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The National Cancer Advisory Board. 25 years later.
Lawrence W
Cancer; 1996 Dec; 78(12):2603-6. PubMed ID: 8952575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Institutional review boards and institutions not doing enough to protect human subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jun; 15(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 12199292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of human subjects in experimentation. Institutional review boards: purposes, protocols, legal responsibilities.
Knepper JD
J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1982 Oct; 53(5):97-101. PubMed ID: 10298700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Institutional review boards have new role in stem cell research.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Oct; 15(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11913434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring institutional change: a yardstick for ethics committees.
Golenski J
Calif Hosp; 1990; 4(3):13, 15, 17. PubMed ID: 10104724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
