These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11482339)

  • 1. Reliability and reproducibility of corneal endothelial image analysis by in vivo confocal microscopy.
    Imre L; Nagymihály A
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 239(5):356-60. PubMed ID: 11482339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Noncontact Specular and Confocal Microscopy for Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium.
    Huang J; Maram J; Tepelus TC; Sadda SR; Chopra V; Lee OL
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Sep; 44 Suppl 1():S144-S150. PubMed ID: 28346276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of endothelial cell count using confocal and contact specular microscopy.
    Klais CM; Bühren J; Kohnen T
    Ophthalmologica; 2003; 217(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 12592045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of manual & automated analysis methods for corneal endothelial cell density measurements by specular microscopy.
    Huang J; Maram J; Tepelus TC; Modak C; Marion K; Sadda SR; Chopra V; Lee OL
    J Optom; 2018; 11(3):182-191. PubMed ID: 28797649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy and noncontact specular microscopy in assessing corneal endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Parisi L; Felletti M; Brusini P
    Cornea; 2011 Jul; 30(7):754-9. PubMed ID: 21150426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of corneal endothelial image analysis by Konan SP8000 noncontact and Bio-Optics Bambi systems.
    Benetz BA; Diaconu E; Bowlin SJ; Oak SS; Laing RA; Lass JH
    Cornea; 1999 Jan; 18(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 9894940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fully automatic evaluation of the corneal endothelium from in vivo confocal microscopy.
    Selig B; Vermeer KA; Rieger B; Hillenaar T; Luengo Hendriks CL
    BMC Med Imaging; 2015 Apr; 15():13. PubMed ID: 25928199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Central and Peripheral Corneal Endothelial Cell Analysis With Slit-Scanning Wide-Field Contact Specular Microscopy: Agreement With Noncontact Specular Microscopy.
    Lee J; Mori Y; Ogata M; Minami K; Miyata K
    Cornea; 2019 Sep; 38(9):1137-1141. PubMed ID: 31394553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endothelial cells analysis with the TOPCON specular microscope SP-2000P and IMAGEnet system.
    Cheung SW; Cho P
    Curr Eye Res; 2000 Oct; 21(4):788-98. PubMed ID: 11120569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Manual endothelial cell enumeration for transplanted corneas in comparison to software controlled, automatic enumeration].
    Kohlhof JK; Ruprecht KW
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Jun; 221(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 15236107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A fully automated cell segmentation and morphometric parameter system for quantifying corneal endothelial cell morphology.
    Al-Fahdawi S; Qahwaji R; Al-Waisy AS; Ipson S; Ferdousi M; Malik RA; Brahma A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 160():11-23. PubMed ID: 29728238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a Reliable Automated Algorithm for the Morphometric Analysis of Human Corneal Endothelium.
    Scarpa F; Ruggeri A
    Cornea; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1222-8. PubMed ID: 27310881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of endothelial assessment during corneal organ culture: comparison of a computer-assisted analyzer with manual methods.
    Deb-Joardar N; Thuret G; Gavet Y; Acquart S; Garraud O; Egelhoffer H; Gain P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 May; 48(5):2062-7. PubMed ID: 17460261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Panoramic view of human corneal endothelial cell layer observed by a prototype slit-scanning wide-field contact specular microscope.
    Tanaka H; Okumura N; Koizumi N; Sotozono C; Sumii Y; Kinoshita S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 101(5):655-659. PubMed ID: 27574178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Endothelial keratopathy in pseudoexfoliation syndrome: quantitative and qualitative morphometry using automated video image analysis].
    Seitz B; Müller EE; Langenbucher A; Kus MM; Naumann GO
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 Sep; 207(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 7474785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of manual and automated endothelial cell density analysis in normal eyes and DSEK eyes.
    Price MO; Fairchild KM; Price FW
    Cornea; 2013 May; 32(5):567-73. PubMed ID: 22893099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Corneal endothelium evaluation with 2 noncontact specular microscopes and their semiautomated methods of analysis.
    de Sanctis U; Machetta F; Razzano L; Dalmasso P; Grignolo FM
    Cornea; 2006 Jun; 25(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 16783136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In-vivo slit scanning confocal microscopy of normal corneas in Indian eyes.
    Vanathi M; Tandon R; Sharma N; Titiyal JS; Pandey RM; Vajpayee RB
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2003 Sep; 51(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 14601847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vivo confocal microscopy of the corneal endothelium: comparison of three morphometry methods after corneal transplantation.
    Jonuscheit S; Doughty MJ; Ramaesh K
    Eye (Lond); 2011 Sep; 25(9):1130-7. PubMed ID: 21660067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of image quality and accuracy of eye bank measurement of donor cornea endothelial cell density in the Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study.
    Lass JH; Gal RL; Ruedy KJ; Benetz BA; Beck RW; Baratz KH; Holland EJ; Kalajian A; Kollman C; Manning FJ; Mannis MJ; McCoy K; Montoya M; Stulting D; Xing D;
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Mar; 112(3):431-40. PubMed ID: 15745770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.