54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11482576)
1. Consequences of a National Mammography Screening Program on diagnostic procedures and tumor sizes in breast cancer. A retrospective study of 1540 cases diagnosed and histologically confirmed between 1995 and 1997.
Scheiden R; Sand J; Tanous AM; Capesius C; Wagener C; Wagnon MC; Knolle U; Faverly D
Pathol Res Pract; 2001; 197(7):467-74. PubMed ID: 11482576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of core-needle biopsy vs fine-needle aspiration on pathologic measurement of tumor size in breast cancer.
Yang JH; Lee WS; Kim SW; Woo SU; Kim JH; Nam SJ
Arch Surg; 2005 Feb; 140(2):125-8. PubMed ID: 15723992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Non palpable lesions of the breast: the Mammotome-biopsy in the preoperative management of breast cancer].
Ceccarelli G; Casciola L; Battistini I; Stefanoni M; Spaziani A; Conti D; Di Zitti L; Valeri R; Bartoli A; Bellochi R; Rambotti M; Pisanelli MC
G Chir; 2005 May; 26(5):187-93. PubMed ID: 16184700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can core needle biopsy replace fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of palpable breast carcinoma. A comparative study of 124 women.
Ballo MS; Sneige N
Cancer; 1996 Aug; 78(4):773-7. PubMed ID: 8756371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Large-core needle biopsy for diagnosis and treatment of breast lesions.
Smyczek-Gargya B; Krainick U; Müller-Schimpfle M; Mielke G; Mayer R; Siegmann K; Mehnert F; Vogel U; Ruck P; Wallwiener D; Fersis N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2002 Aug; 266(4):198-200. PubMed ID: 12192478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast carcinoma in situ in 167 women--incidence, mode of presentation, therapy and follow-up.
Ringberg A; Andersson I; Aspegren K; Linell F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1991 Oct; 17(5):466-76. PubMed ID: 1657650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficiency of Core Biopsy for BI-RADS-5 Breast Lesions.
Wolf R; Quan G; Calhoun K; Soot L; Skokan L
Breast J; 2008; 14(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 18821933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The value of aspiration cytology within the scope of triple diagnosis of palpable breast changes].
Schuhmann R; Hübner F; Brose C; Eckel S; Geier G; Kraus H; Schöndorf H; Schöndorf NK
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1995 Oct; 55(10):553-8. PubMed ID: 8543127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Good results in periodic screening in women with increased risk of breast cancer; retrospective study].
Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Bartels CC; Obdeijn AI; Kuenen-Boumeester V; Klijn JG; Oudkerk M
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Mar; 139(9):445-9. PubMed ID: 7891766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with ipsilateral breast carcinoma: the role of mammography.
Muttarak M; Pojchamarnwiputh S; Padungchaichote W; Chaiwun B
Singapore Med J; 2002 May; 43(5):229-33. PubMed ID: 12188073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Results and evaluation of 3 years of a large scale mammography program in the Ariana area of Tunisia].
Bouchlaka A; Ben Abdallah M; Ben Aissa R; Zaanouni E; Kribi L; Smida S; M'barek F; Ben Hamida A; Boussen H; Gueddana N
Tunis Med; 2009 Jul; 87(7):438-42. PubMed ID: 20063676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In search of specimen adequacy in fine-needle aspirates of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Rubenchik I; Sneige N; Edeiken B; Samuels B; Fornage B
Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jul; 108(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 9208973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive procedures for breast cancer screening at a teaching hospital.
Verenhitach BD; Elias S; Patrocínio AC; Nazário AC; Waizberg A
J Clin Pathol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):858-61. PubMed ID: 21666140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incidence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in a screening program by age: should older women continue screening?
Erbas B; Amos A; Fletcher A; Kavanagh AM; Gertig DM
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Oct; 13(10):1569-73. PubMed ID: 15466971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying factors contributing to reduced breast tumor size: a longitudinal study.
Rovera F; Dionigi G; Riva C; Chiaravalli A; Corben AD; Bianchi V; Cinquepalmi L; Boni L; Dionigi R
Int J Surg; 2008; 6 Suppl 1():S97-S100. PubMed ID: 19131284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Triple-negative breast cancer in West Virginia.
Abraham J; Flanagan M; Hazard H; Jubelirer S; Tirona MT; Vona-Davis L
W V Med J; 2009 Oct; 105 Spec No():54-9. PubMed ID: 19999267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stereotactic breast biopsy is accurate, minimally invasive, and cost effective.
Pettine S; Place R; Babu S; Williard W; Kim D; Carter P
Am J Surg; 1996 May; 171(5):474-6. PubMed ID: 8651388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of magnetic resonance imaging mammography in the surgical management of the index breast cancer.
Bagley FH
Arch Surg; 2004 Apr; 139(4):380-3; discussion 383. PubMed ID: 15078704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
