788 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11483347)
1. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monte Carlo evaluation of 6 MV intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for head and neck and lung treatments.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2705-17. PubMed ID: 12462739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue heterogeneities corrections in the treatment of head and neck cancer patients using stereotactic radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; McClinton C; Sood S; Badkul R; Saleh H; Jiang H; Lominska C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):258-270. PubMed ID: 27074489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric advantage of using 6 MV over 15 MV photons in conformal therapy of lung cancer: Monte Carlo studies in patient geometries.
Wang L; Yorke E; Desobry G; Chui CS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11818004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional dosimetric evaluation of a conventional radiotherapy technique for treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Choi PH; Cheung KY; Lee WY
Radiother Oncol; 2001 Feb; 58(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 11166865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a pencil-beam dose calculation technique for charged particle radiotherapy.
Petti PL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Jul; 35(5):1049-57. PubMed ID: 8751415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of dose calculation algorithms for dynamic arc treatments of head and neck tumors.
Linthout N; Verellen D; Van Acker S; Voordeckers M; Bretz A; Storme G
Radiother Oncol; 2002 Jul; 64(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 12208579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of deep inspiration breath-hold lung treatment plans with Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Yorke ED; Wang L; Rosenzweig KE; Mah D; Paoli JB; Chui CS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jul; 53(4):1058-70. PubMed ID: 12095575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the University of California-San Francisco experience.
Sultanem K; Shu HK; Xia P; Akazawa C; Quivey JM; Verhey LJ; Fu KK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Oct; 48(3):711-22. PubMed ID: 11020568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A patient-specific Monte Carlo dose-calculation method for photon beams.
Wang L; Chui CS; Lovelock M
Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):867-78. PubMed ID: 9650174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo treatment planning system.
Ma CM; Mok E; Kapur A; Pawlicki T; Findley D; Brain S; Forster K; Boyer AL
Med Phys; 1999 Oct; 26(10):2133-43. PubMed ID: 10535630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms in conformal lung radiotherapy.
Elcim Y; Dirican B; Yavas O
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):616-624. PubMed ID: 30079474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photon scatter in portal images: accuracy of a fluence based pencil beam superposition algorithm.
McCurdy BM; Pistorius S
Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):913-22. PubMed ID: 10841394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of simple tissue inhomogeneity correction algorithms on conformal radiotherapy of lung tumours.
Engelsman M; Damen EM; Koken PW; van 't Veld AA; van Ingen KM; Mijnheer BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2001 Sep; 60(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 11514010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Underdosage of the upper-airway mucosa for small fields as used in intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a comparison between radiochromic film measurements, Monte Carlo simulations, and collapsed cone convolution calculations.
Martens C; Reynaert N; De Wagter C; Nilsson P; Coghe M; Palmans H; Thierens H; De Neve W
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1528-35. PubMed ID: 12148735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Limitations of a pencil beam approach to photon dose calculations in the head and neck region.
Hurkmans C; Knöös T; Nilsson P; Svahn-Tapper G; Danielsson H
Radiother Oncol; 1995 Oct; 37(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 8539461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modulated beam conformal therapy for head and neck tumors.
Boyer AL; Geis P; Grant W; Carol M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Aug; 39(1):227-36. PubMed ID: 9300758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo dose computation for IMRT optimization.
Laub W; Alber M; Birkner M; Nüsslin F
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Jul; 45(7):1741-54. PubMed ID: 10943916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional radiotherapy of head and neck and esophageal carcinomas: a monoisocentric treatment technique to achieve improved dose distributions.
Ahmad M; Nath R
Int J Cancer; 2001 Feb; 96(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 11241330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proton radiation therapy (PRT) for pediatric optic pathway gliomas: comparison with 3D planned conventional photons and a standard photon technique.
Fuss M; Hug EB; Schaefer RA; Nevinny-Stickel M; Miller DW; Slater JM; Slater JD
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Dec; 45(5):1117-26. PubMed ID: 10613303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
