1453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11483347)
21. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans.
Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G
Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical evaluation of X-ray voxel Monte Carlo versus pencil beam-based dose calculation in stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung cancer under normal and deep inspiration breath hold.
Landoni V; Borzì GR; Strolin S; Bruzzaniti V; Soriani A; D'Alessio D; Ambesi F; Di Grazia AM; Strigari L
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jun; 14(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 25223324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiotherapy dose calculations in the presence of hip prostheses.
Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Jeraj R; Mohan R
Med Dosim; 2003; 28(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 12804709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of treatment plans using intensity-modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for paranasal sinus carcinoma.
Huang D; Xia P; Akazawa P; Akazawa C; Quivey JM; Verhey LJ; Kaplan M; Lee N
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 May; 56(1):158-68. PubMed ID: 12694834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of deep inspiration breath-hold lung treatment plans with Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Yorke ED; Wang L; Rosenzweig KE; Mah D; Paoli JB; Chui CS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jul; 53(4):1058-70. PubMed ID: 12095575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Three-dimensional intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the University of California-San Francisco experience.
Sultanem K; Shu HK; Xia P; Akazawa C; Quivey JM; Verhey LJ; Fu KK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Oct; 48(3):711-22. PubMed ID: 11020568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Treatment verification in the presence of inhomogeneities using EPID-based three-dimensional dose reconstruction.
van Elmpt WJ; Nijsten SM; Dekker AL; Mijnheer BJ; Lambin P
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2816-26. PubMed ID: 17821989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Investigation of four-dimensional (4D) Monte Carlo dose calculation in real-time tumor tracking stereotatic body radiotherapy for lung cancers.
Chan MK; Kwong DL; Ng SC; Tam EK; Tong AS
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5479-87. PubMed ID: 22957615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dosimetric comparison of iPlan
Menon SV; Paramu R; Bhasi S; Gopalakrishnan Z; Bhaskaran S; Nair RK
Med Dosim; 2020 Autumn; 45(3):225-234. PubMed ID: 32001069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A patient-specific Monte Carlo dose-calculation method for photon beams.
Wang L; Chui CS; Lovelock M
Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):867-78. PubMed ID: 9650174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A new treatment planning approach accounting for prompt gamma range verification and interfractional anatomical changes.
Tian L; Landry G; Dedes G; Pinto M; Kamp F; Belka C; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Apr; 65(9):095005. PubMed ID: 32135530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of IMRT optimization based on a pencil beam and a superposition algorithm.
Scholz C; Nill S; Oelfke U
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1909-13. PubMed ID: 12906209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A CT-based analytical dose calculation method for HDR 192Ir brachytherapy.
Poon E; Verhaegen F
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3982-94. PubMed ID: 19810471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A study of planning dose constraints for treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma using a commercial inverse treatment planning system.
Xia P; Lee N; Liu YM; Poon I; Weinberg V; Shin E; Quivey JM; Verhey LJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jul; 59(3):886-96. PubMed ID: 15183492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo treatment planning system.
Ma CM; Mok E; Kapur A; Pawlicki T; Findley D; Brain S; Forster K; Boyer AL
Med Phys; 1999 Oct; 26(10):2133-43. PubMed ID: 10535630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dosimetric errors during treatment of centrally located lung tumors with stereotactic body radiation therapy: Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity corrections.
Altunbas C; Kavanagh B; Dzingle W; Stuhr K; Gaspar L; Miften M
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 24119416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dosimetric comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms in conformal lung radiotherapy.
Elcim Y; Dirican B; Yavas O
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):616-624. PubMed ID: 30079474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dose differences in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans calculated with pencil beam and Monte Carlo for lung SBRT.
Liu H; Zhuang T; Stephans K; Videtic G; Raithel S; Djemil T; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):91–99. PubMed ID: 26699560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Photon scatter in portal images: accuracy of a fluence based pencil beam superposition algorithm.
McCurdy BM; Pistorius S
Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):913-22. PubMed ID: 10841394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
