259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11483348)
1. A protocol for the reduction of systematic patient setup errors with minimal portal imaging workload.
de Boer HC; Heijmen BJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1350-65. PubMed ID: 11483348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new approach to off-line setup corrections: combining safety with minimum workload.
de Boer JC; Heijmen BJ
Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):1998-2012. PubMed ID: 12349921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy and workload analysis of a fixed vertical couch position technique and a fixed-action-level protocol in whole-breast radiotherapy.
Petillion S; Verhoeven K; Weltens C; Van den Heuvel F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):5265. PubMed ID: 26103197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. eNAL++: a new and effective off-line correction protocol for rotational setup errors when using a robotic couch.
Martens D; Luesink M; Huizenga H; Pasma KL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):177-185. PubMed ID: 26699569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of the No Action Level (NAL) protocol to correct for prostate motion based on electronic portal imaging of implanted markers.
de Boer HC; van Os MJ; Jansen PP; Heijmen BJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(4):969-83. PubMed ID: 15752876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correction of systematic setup errors in prostate radiation therapy: how many images to perform?
Ludbrook JJ; Greer PB; Blood P; D'yachkova Y; Coldman A; Beckham WA; Runkel J; Olivotto IA
Med Dosim; 2005; 30(2):76-84. PubMed ID: 15922173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Portal imaging protocol for radical dose-escalated radiotherapy treatment of prostate cancer.
Mubata CD; Bidmead AM; Ellingham LM; Thompson V; Dearnaley DP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jan; 40(1):221-31. PubMed ID: 9422580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. eNAL: an extension of the NAL setup correction protocol for effective use of weekly follow-up measurements.
de Boer HC; Heijmen BJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Apr; 67(5):1586-95. PubMed ID: 17394953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Coping with interfraction time trends in tumor setup.
Giżyńska MK; Kukołowicz PF; Heijmen BJM
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):331-341. PubMed ID: 31721232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An assessment of action levels in imaging strategies in head and neck cancer using TomoTherapy. Are our margins adequate in the absence of image guidance?
Houghton F; Benson RJ; Tudor GS; Fairfoul J; Gemmill J; Dean JC; Routsis DS; Jefferies SJ; Burnet NG
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Nov; 21(9):720-7. PubMed ID: 19740637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adaptive modification of treatment planning to minimize the deleterious effects of treatment setup errors.
Yan D; Wong J; Vicini F; Michalski J; Pan C; Frazier A; Horwitz E; Martinez A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Apr; 38(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 9212024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis and reduction of 3D systematic and random setup errors during the simulation and treatment of lung cancer patients with CT-based external beam radiotherapy dose planning.
de Boer HC; van Sörnsen de Koste JR; Senan S; Visser AG; Heijmen BJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Mar; 49(3):857-68. PubMed ID: 11172970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the Need for Daily Image Guidance in Head and Neck Cancers Treated with Helical Tomotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis of a Large Number of Daily Imaging-based Corrections.
Saha A; Mallick I; Das P; Shrimali RK; Achari R; Chatterjee S
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2016 Mar; 28(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 26746002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image guidance in prostate cancer - can offline corrections be an effective substitute for daily online imaging?
Prasad D; Das P; Saha NS; Chatterjee S; Achari R; Mallick I
J Cancer Res Ther; 2014; 10(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 24762481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of multiple image-based modalities for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of prostate carcinoma: a prospective study.
Mayyas E; Chetty IJ; Chetvertkov M; Wen N; Neicu T; Nurushev T; Ren L; Lu M; Stricker H; Pradhan D; Movsas B; Elshaikh MA
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041707. PubMed ID: 23556877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of prostate patient setup and tracking data: potential intervention strategies.
Su Z; Zhang L; Murphy M; Williamson J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Nov; 81(3):880-7. PubMed ID: 20934274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of DVH parameter changes due to setup errors for breast cancer treatment based on 2D portal dosimetry.
Nijsten SM; van Elmpt WJ; Mijnheer BJ; Minken AW; Persoon LC; Lambin P; Dekker AL
Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 19235376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrospective analysis of prostate cancer patients with implanted gold markers using off-line and adaptive therapy protocols.
Litzenberg DW; Balter JM; Lam KL; Sandler HM; Ten Haken RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Sep; 63(1):123-33. PubMed ID: 16111580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A service evaluation of on-line image-guided radiotherapy to lower extremity sarcoma: Investigating the workload implications of a 3 mm action level for image assessment and correction prior to delivery.
Taylor C; Parker J; Stratford J; Warren M
Radiography (Lond); 2018 May; 24(2):142-145. PubMed ID: 29605111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correction of systematic set-up error in breast and head and neck irradiation through a no-action level (NAL) protocol.
Lozano EM; Pérez LA; Torres J; Carrascosa C; Sanz M; Mendicote F; Gil A
Clin Transl Oncol; 2011 Jan; 13(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 21239353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
