87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11484495)
1. GroEL/GroES interaction assayed by protease protection.
Martin J
Methods Mol Biol; 2000; 140():71-4. PubMed ID: 11484495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assembly and disassembly of GroEL and GroES complexes.
Martin J
Methods Mol Biol; 2000; 140():65-70. PubMed ID: 11484494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Folding with and without encapsulation by cis- and trans-only GroEL-GroES complexes.
Farr GW; Fenton WA; Chaudhuri TK; Clare DK; Saibil HR; Horwich AL
EMBO J; 2003 Jul; 22(13):3220-30. PubMed ID: 12839985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cryo-EM structure of the native GroEL-GroES complex from thermus thermophilus encapsulating substrate inside the cavity.
Kanno R; Koike-Takeshita A; Yokoyama K; Taguchi H; Mitsuoka K
Structure; 2009 Feb; 17(2):287-93. PubMed ID: 19217399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterisation of mutations in GroES that allow GroEL to function as a single ring.
Liu H; Kovács E; Lund PA
FEBS Lett; 2009 Jul; 583(14):2365-71. PubMed ID: 19545569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Purification and characterization of the GroESLx chaperonins from the symbiotic X-bacteria in Amoeba proteus.
Jung GH; Ahn TI
Protein Expr Purif; 2001 Dec; 23(3):459-67. PubMed ID: 11722184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. NMR analysis of a 900K GroEL GroES complex.
Fiaux J; Bertelsen EB; Horwich AL; Wüthrich K
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):207-11. PubMed ID: 12110894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The mechanism of GroEL/GroES folding/refolding of protein substrates revisited.
Jones H; Preuss M; Wright M; Miller AD
Org Biomol Chem; 2006 Apr; 4(7):1223-35. PubMed ID: 16557310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hidden order in the GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin: forms, folding, and ADP-binding sites.
Janner A
Proteins; 2003 Apr; 51(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 12596269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Structural features of the GroEL-GroES nano-cage required for rapid folding of encapsulated protein.
Tang YC; Chang HC; Roeben A; Wischnewski D; Wischnewski N; Kerner MJ; Hartl FU; Hayer-Hartl M
Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(5):903-14. PubMed ID: 16751100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mapping pathways of allosteric communication in GroEL by analysis of correlated mutations.
Kass I; Horovitz A
Proteins; 2002 Sep; 48(4):611-7. PubMed ID: 12211028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Co-expression of chaperonin GroEL/GroES enhances in vivo folding of yeast mitochondrial aconitase and alters the growth characteristics of Escherichia coli.
Gupta P; Aggarwal N; Batra P; Mishra S; Chaudhuri TK
Int J Biochem Cell Biol; 2006; 38(11):1975-85. PubMed ID: 16822698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Secondary structure forming propensity coupled with amphiphilicity is an optimal motif in a peptide or protein for association with chaperonin 60 (GroEL).
Preuss M; Hutchinson JP; Miller AD
Biochemistry; 1999 Aug; 38(32):10272-86. PubMed ID: 10441121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assay of chaperonin-assisted refolding of citrate synthase.
Steede NK; Temkin SL; Landry SJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2000; 140():133-8. PubMed ID: 11484480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Allostery wiring diagrams in the transitions that drive the GroEL reaction cycle.
Tehver R; Chen J; Thirumalai D
J Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 387(2):390-406. PubMed ID: 19121324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Probing protein-protein interactions in real time.
Viani MB; Pietrasanta LI; Thompson JB; Chand A; Gebeshuber IC; Kindt JH; Richter M; Hansma HG; Hansma PK
Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Aug; 7(8):644-7. PubMed ID: 10932247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Refolding of bovine mitochondrial rhodanese by chaperonins GroEL and GroES.
Weber F; Hayer-Hartl M
Methods Mol Biol; 2000; 140():117-26. PubMed ID: 11484478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Assay of malate dehydrogenase. A substrate for the E. coli chaperonins GroEL and GroES.
Hayer-Hartl M
Methods Mol Biol; 2000; 140():127-32. PubMed ID: 11484479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Crystal structure of the native chaperonin complex from Thermus thermophilus revealed unexpected asymmetry at the cis-cavity.
Shimamura T; Koike-Takeshita A; Yokoyama K; Masui R; Murai N; Yoshida M; Taguchi H; Iwata S
Structure; 2004 Aug; 12(8):1471-80. PubMed ID: 15296740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. GroEL walks the fine line: the subtle balance of substrate and co-chaperonin binding by GroEL. A combinatorial investigation by design, selection and screening.
Kawe M; Plückthun A
J Mol Biol; 2006 Mar; 357(2):411-26. PubMed ID: 16427651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
