BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11484648)

  • 1. The assessment of quality in medical diagnostic tests: a comparison of ROC/Youden and Taguchi methods.
    Taner T; Antony J
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv; 2000; 13(6-7):300-7. PubMed ID: 11484648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Routine receiver operating characteristic analysis in mammography as a measure of radiologists' performance.
    Goddard CC; Gilbert FJ; Needham G; Deans HE
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Oct; 71(850):1012-7. PubMed ID: 10211059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applying Taguchi methods to health care.
    Taner T; Antony J
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv; 2006; 19(1):xxvi-xxxv. PubMed ID: 16548401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
    Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Users' guide to the surgical literature. Self-audit and practice appraisal for surgeons.
    Birch DW; Goldsmith CH; Tandan V;
    Can J Surg; 2005 Feb; 48(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 15757040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of treatment thresholds to diagnostic-test evaluation: an alternative to the comparison of areas under receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Moons KG; Stijnen T; Michel BC; Büller HR; Van Es GA; Grobbee DE; Habbema JD
    Med Decis Making; 1997; 17(4):447-54. PubMed ID: 9343803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reassessment of the CAGE questionnaire by ROC/Taguchi methods.
    Taner MT; Antony J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2004; 20(2):242-6. PubMed ID: 15209185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An enhancement of ROC curves made them clinically relevant for diagnostic-test comparison and optimal-threshold determination.
    Subtil F; Rabilloud M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):752-9. PubMed ID: 25660050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining dependent tests to compare the diagnostic accuracies--a non-parametric approach.
    Yang Y; Jin Z
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1239-50. PubMed ID: 16158406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Methodical and practical approaches to the management of health care quality control in a large military polyclinic].
    Kartashov VT
    Voen Med Zh; 2004 Apr; 325(4):15-23, 112. PubMed ID: 15188534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Receiver operating characteristics of perceptrons: influence of sample size and prevalence.
    Freking A; Biehl M; Braun C; Kinzel W; Meesmann M
    Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics; 1999 Nov; 60(5 Pt B):5926-31. PubMed ID: 11970494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality care is job one.
    Warnock GL
    Can J Surg; 2005 Feb; 48(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 15757028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the APACHE III, APACHE II and Glasgow Coma Scale in acute head injury for prediction of mortality and functional outcome.
    Cho DY; Wang YC
    Intensive Care Med; 1997 Jan; 23(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 9037644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting the performance of the models in the Mortality Probability Model II system and strategies of customization: a simulation study.
    Zhu BP; Lemeshow S; Hosmer DW; Klar J; Avrunin J; Teres D
    Crit Care Med; 1996 Jan; 24(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 8565539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring and estimating diagnostic accuracy when there are three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Morris JC
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1251-73. PubMed ID: 16345029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Notes on the overlap measure as an alternative to the Youden index: How are they related?
    Samawi HM; Yin J; Rochani H; Panchal V
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4230-4240. PubMed ID: 28809042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of the Cusum technique in the assessment of trainee competence in new procedures.
    Bolsin S; Colson M
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2000 Oct; 12(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 11079224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Paired ROC Curves through a Two-Stage Test.
    Yu W; Park E; Chang YC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):881-902. PubMed ID: 24905904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mortality predictions in the intensive care unit: comparing physicians with scoring systems.
    Sinuff T; Adhikari NK; Cook DJ; Schünemann HJ; Griffith LE; Rocker G; Walter SD
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Mar; 34(3):878-85. PubMed ID: 16505667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices.
    Obuchowski NA; McClish DK
    Stat Med; 1997 Jul; 16(13):1529-42. PubMed ID: 9249923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.