These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11484740)

  • 41. [Study of directional differences on static and stress urethral pressure profiles of female urethra].
    Masuda H; Yamada T; Nagamatsu H; Nagahama K; Kawakami S; Watanabe T; Negishi T; Morita T
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1997 Jan; 88(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 9038051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Intrasubject variability of the pressure-transmission ratio in patients with genuine stress incontinence.
    Swift SE; Rust PF; Ostergard DR
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 1996; 7(6):312-6. PubMed ID: 9203478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Urethral pressure profile: is it affected by position?
    Dörflinger A; Gorton E; Stanton S; Dreher E
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2002; 21(6):553-7. PubMed ID: 12382246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Value of the cough pressure profile in the evaluation of patients with stress incontinence.
    Richardson DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Oct; 155(4):808-11. PubMed ID: 3766634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Stress incontinence in females: treatment with phenylpropanolamine. A urodynamic and pharmacological evaluation.
    Fossberg E; Beisland HO; Lundgren RA
    Urol Int; 1983; 38(5):293-9. PubMed ID: 6685364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The static urethral closure pressure profile in female incontinence. A comparison between sphincter and detrusor incontinence.
    de Jonge MC; Kornelis JA; van den Berg J
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1981; 78():231-8. PubMed ID: 7199729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Value of urethral pressure profilometry in the female incontinent patient: a prospective trial with an 8-channel urethral catheter.
    Haeusler G; Tempfer C; Heinzl H; Sam C; Hefler L; Hanzal E; Koelbl H
    Urology; 1998 Dec; 52(6):1113-7. PubMed ID: 9836565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Decrease in urethral pressure following repeated cough efforts: a new concept for pathophysiology of stress urinary incontinence.
    Deffieux X; Hubeaux K; Porcher R; Ismael SS; Raibaut P; Amarenco G
    Int J Urol; 2007 Nov; 14(11):1019-24. PubMed ID: 17956530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Should maximal urethral closure pressure be performed before midurethral sling surgery for stress incontinence? A time to revisit.
    Vij M; Dua A; Freeman RM
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1491-5. PubMed ID: 27010558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of occluding the urethra while recording urethral stress profile.
    Meyer S; DeGrandi P; Schmidt N
    Urology; 1991 Aug; 38(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 1877134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction and pelvic floor muscle training on urethral closure pressures: a systematic literature review.
    Zubieta M; Carr RL; Drake MJ; Bø K
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 May; 27(5):687-96. PubMed ID: 26407561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Analysis of the success rates of Burch colposuspension in relation to Valsalva leak-point pressure.
    Bai SW; Park JH; Kim SK; Park KH
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Mar; 50(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 15841931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Dynamic urethral pressure/profilometry pressure transmission ratio determinations in stress-incontinent and stress-continent subjects.
    Bump RC; Copeland WE; Hurt WG; Fantl JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Sep; 159(3):749-55. PubMed ID: 3421275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Proteomic analysis related to stress urinary incontinence following vaginal trauma in female mice.
    Chen HY; Chen CJ; Lin YN; Chen YH; Chen WC; Chen CM
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Nov; 171(1):171-9. PubMed ID: 24054828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Preoperative MUCP and VLPP did not predict long-term (4-year) outcome after transobturator mid-urethral sling.
    Costantini E; Lazzeri M; Giannantoni A; Bini V; del Zingaro M; Porena M
    Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):392-8. PubMed ID: 19996644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparison of urethral profilometry using microtip and fiberoptic catheters.
    Elser DM; London W; Fantl JA; McBride MA; Beck RP
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 1999; 10(6):371-4. PubMed ID: 10614972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A randomized comparison of microtip and air-charged catheter for the measurement of maximum urethral closure pressure.
    Mueller MM; Baumann MU; Mueller MD; Kuhn A
    Ginekol Pol; 2012 Aug; 83(8):586-9. PubMed ID: 23342881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Correlation between the leak point pressure and the clinical grade of incontinence].
    Larosa M; Simonazzi M; Pozzoli GL; Sebastio N; Cortellini P
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 1998 Apr; 70(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 9616983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Incompetent urethral closure mechanism in females. Experimental and clinical studies with special reference to diagnosis and classification.
    Fossberg E; Beisland HO
    Urol Int; 1982; 37(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 7202272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Intraoperative maximal urethral closing pressure measurement: a new technique of tape tension adjustment in transobturator sling surgery?
    Kang MB; Kim HG; Paick SH; Lho YS; Park HK
    Int Braz J Urol; 2011; 37(6):751-7. PubMed ID: 22234003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.