These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11484801)

  • 1. Comparison of balanced and random allocation in clinical trials: a simulation study.
    Rovers MM; Straatman H; Zielhuis GA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2000; 16(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 11484801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mind the gap: covariate constrained randomisation can protect against substantial power loss in parallel cluster randomised trials.
    Kristunas C; Grayling M; Gray LJ; Hemming K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):111. PubMed ID: 35413793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-way minimization: a novel treatment allocation method for small trials.
    Chen LH; Lee WC
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28604. PubMed ID: 22163317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using a balancing procedure in multicenter clinical trials. Simulation of patient allocation based on a trial of ventilation tubes for otitis media with effusion in infants.
    Rovers MM; Straatman H; Zielhuis GA; Ingels K; van der Wilt GJ
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2000; 16(1):276-81. PubMed ID: 10815372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Merged block randomisation: A novel randomisation procedure for small clinical trials.
    van der Pas SL
    Clin Trials; 2019 Jun; 16(3):246-252. PubMed ID: 30761907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of Covariance in Randomized Experiments with Heterogeneity of Regression and a Random Covariate: The Variance of the Estimated Treatment Effect at Selected Covariate Values.
    Li L; McLouth CJ; Delaney HD
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(6):926-940. PubMed ID: 31795755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adjusting for multiple prognostic factors in the analysis of randomised trials.
    Kahan BC; Morris TP
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jul; 13():99. PubMed ID: 23898993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simulation study of the validity and efficiency of design-adaptive allocation to two groups in the regression situation.
    Aickin M
    Int J Biostat; 2009 May; 5(1):Article 19. PubMed ID: 20224630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Shiny Balancer - software and imbalance criteria for optimally balanced treatment allocation in small RCTs and cRCTs.
    Grischott T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):108. PubMed ID: 30326827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.
    Hagino A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I; Ohashi Y; Sakamoto J; Nakazato H
    Control Clin Trials; 2004 Dec; 25(6):572-84. PubMed ID: 15588744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials.
    Kunz R; Oxman AD
    BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7167):1185-90. PubMed ID: 9794851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating adjusted NNTs in randomised controlled trials with binary outcomes: a simulation study.
    Bender R; Vervölgyi V
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Sep; 31(5):498-505. PubMed ID: 20624484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials.
    Kunz R; Vist G; Oxman AD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; (2):MR000012. PubMed ID: 17443633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating the relationship between predictability and imbalance in minimisation: a simulation study.
    McPherson GC; Campbell MK; Elbourne DR
    Trials; 2013 Mar; 14():86. PubMed ID: 23537389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Random allocation in controlled clinical trials: a review.
    Egbewale BE
    J Pharm Pharm Sci; 2014; 17(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 24934553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of randomisation in clinical trials: a survey of UK practice.
    McPherson GC; Campbell MK; Elbourne DR
    Trials; 2012 Oct; 13():198. PubMed ID: 23101457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What is the influence of randomisation sequence generation and allocation concealment on treatment effects of physical therapy trials? A meta-epidemiological study.
    Armijo-Olivo S; Saltaji H; da Costa BR; Fuentes J; Ha C; Cummings GG
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008562. PubMed ID: 26338841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of heterogeneous variance on efficiency and power of cluster randomized trials with a balanced 2 × 2 factorial design.
    Lemme F; van Breukelen GJ; Candel MJ; Berger MP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Oct; 24(5):574-93. PubMed ID: 25911332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How large are the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study with a continuous outcome and a binary covariate at the cluster level.
    Moerbeek M; van Schie S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():79. PubMed ID: 27401771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simple compared to covariate-constrained randomization methods in balancing baseline characteristics: a case study of randomly allocating 72 hemodialysis centers in a cluster trial.
    Al-Jaishi AA; Dixon SN; McArthur E; Devereaux PJ; Thabane L; Garg AX
    Trials; 2021 Sep; 22(1):626. PubMed ID: 34526092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.