371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11485126)
1. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wrist blood pressure-measuring devices: a comparative study of accuracy with a standard auscultatory method using a mercury manometer.
Altunkan S; Yildiz S; Azer S
Blood Press Monit; 2002 Oct; 7(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 12409888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of two automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) and the Omron R7 (HEM 637-IT).
Topouchian JA; El Assaad MA; Orobinskaia LV; El Feghali RN; Asmar RG
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 16702826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor.
Stergiou GS; Karpettas N; Kollias A; Destounis A; Tzamouranis D
J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 26(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21900952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of automated blood pressure monitors.
Nelson D; Kennedy B; Regnerus C; Schweinle A
J Dent Hyg; 2008; 82(4):35. PubMed ID: 18755068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of an automated oscillometric blood pressure wrist device.
Cuckson AC; Moran P; Seed P; Reinders A; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 15021076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Home blood pressure measurement: validation of the Braun BP 2550 (UG) monitor according to the ESH International Protocol.
Nolly H; Romero M; Nolly A; Osso P; Reinoso O; Nolly M
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 15021079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of an ambulatory blood pressure measuring device and a wrist blood pressure monitor with a position sensor versus a mercury sphygmomanometer.
Altunkan S; Genç Y; Altunkan E
Eur J Intern Med; 2007 Mar; 18(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 17338963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Value of blood pressure of adults depending on method of measurement].
Wielemborek-Musiał K; Jegier A
Pol Arch Med Wewn; 2006 Jun; 115(6):529-34. PubMed ID: 17263224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the OMRON M7 (HEM-780-E) blood pressure measuring device in a population requiring large cuff use according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
El Feghali RN; Topouchian JA; Pannier BM; El Assaad HA; Asmar RG;
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 17496467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can validated wrist devices with position sensors replace arm devices for self-home blood pressure monitoring? A randomized crossover trial using ambulatory monitoring as reference.
Stergiou GS; Christodoulakis GR; Nasothimiou EG; Giovas PP; Kalogeropoulos PG
Am J Hypertens; 2008 Jul; 21(7):753-8. PubMed ID: 18443566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Mean blood pressure among the adults in China 2010-2012: based on the results of mercury sphygmomanometer and converted electronic sphygmomanometer].
Yu DM; Fu P; Yu WT; Guo HJ; Yang XG; Zhao WH; Zhao LY
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 51(10):933-938. PubMed ID: 29036997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Failure of the community-based Vita-Stat automated blood pressure device to accurately measure blood pressure.
Whitcomb BL; Prochazka A; LoVerde M; Byyny RL
Arch Fam Med; 1995 May; 4(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 7742964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
Farsky S; Benova K; Krausova D; Sirotiaková J; Vysocanova P
Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):252-7. PubMed ID: 21914986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of arm position and pulse pressure on the validation of a wrist-cuff blood pressure measurement device in a high risk population.
Khoshdel AR; Carney S; Gillies A
Int J Gen Med; 2010 Apr; 3():119-25. PubMed ID: 20463830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
