These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11485190)

  • 1. Spatial attention in early vision.
    Theeuwes J; Kramer AF; Atchley P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2001 Jun; 108(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 11485190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional effects on preattentive vision: spatial precues affect the detection of simple features.
    Theeuwes J; Kramer AF; Atchley P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Apr; 25(2):341-7. PubMed ID: 10205859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Top-down control over biased competition during covert spatial orienting.
    Awh E; Matsukura M; Serences JT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 12669747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reward breaks through the inhibitory region around attentional focus.
    Wang L; Duan Y; Theeuwes J; Zhou X
    J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25280985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional control settings prevent abrupt onsets from capturing visual spatial attention.
    Al-Aidroos N; Harrison S; Pratt J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 19728228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention: reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms.
    Prinzmetal W; McCool C; Park S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Feb; 134(1):73-92. PubMed ID: 15702964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays?
    Scolari M; Kohnen A; Barton B; Awh E
    J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(2):7.1-23. PubMed ID: 18217822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons.
    Theeuwes J; Burger R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1342-53. PubMed ID: 9778827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time course of inhibition of return in a spatial cueing paradigm with distractors.
    Eng V; Lim A; Janssen SMJ; Satel J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():51-57. PubMed ID: 29328938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attended but unseen: visual attention is not sufficient for visual awareness.
    Kentridge RW; Nijboer TC; Heywood CA
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Feb; 46(3):864-9. PubMed ID: 18237752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
    Lamy D; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preparatory states in crossmodal spatial attention: spatial specificity and possible control mechanisms.
    Macaluso E; Eimer M; Frith CD; Driver J
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Mar; 149(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 12592504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attention and luminance detection: effects of cues, masks, and pedestals.
    Smith PL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Aug; 26(4):1401-20. PubMed ID: 10946722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Allocating attention in the visual field: the effects of cue type and target-distractor confusability.
    Laarni J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Dec; 103(3):281-94. PubMed ID: 10668301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Paying attention to working memory: Similarities in the spatial distribution of attention in mental and physical space.
    Sahan MI; Verguts T; Boehler CN; Pourtois G; Fias W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Aug; 23(4):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26704925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age similarities in the inertial properties of attention.
    Gottlob LR; Madden DJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 May; 61(4):740-55. PubMed ID: 10370340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combined expectancies: event-related potentials reveal the early benefits of spatial attention that are obscured by reaction time measures.
    Handy TC; Green V; Klein RM; Mangun GR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Apr; 27(2):303-17. PubMed ID: 11318049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Focal distraction: spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture.
    Ghorashi SM; Zuvic SM; Visser TA; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 12669749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disentangling the effects of spatial cues on selection and formation of auditory objects.
    Ihlefeld A; Shinn-Cunningham B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2224-35. PubMed ID: 19062861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.