These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11485191)

  • 1. Directing spatial attention towards the illusory location of a ventriloquized sound.
    Vroomen J; Bertelson P; de Gelder B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2001 Jun; 108(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 11485191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attracting attention to the illusory location of a sound: reflexive crossmodal orienting and ventriloquism.
    Spence C; Driver J
    Neuroreport; 2000 Jun; 11(9):2057-61. PubMed ID: 10884070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sound affects the speed of visual processing.
    Keetels M; Vroomen J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):699-708. PubMed ID: 20854000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.
    Schmitt M; Postma A; De Haan E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the influence of sound parameters on crossmodal cuing in different regions of space.
    Lee J; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():96-103. PubMed ID: 29438877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual sensitivity is a stronger determinant of illusory processes than auditory cue parameters in the sound-induced flash illusion.
    Kumpik DP; Roberts HE; King AJ; Bizley JK
    J Vis; 2014 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 24961249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tactile recalibration of auditory spatial representations.
    Bruns P; Spence C; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Mar; 209(3):333-44. PubMed ID: 21279335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating the time course of tactile reflexive attention using a non-spatial discrimination task.
    Miles E; Poliakoff E; Brown RJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 18262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial and non-spatial multisensory cueing in unilateral cochlear implant users.
    Pavani F; Venturini M; Baruffaldi F; Artesini L; Bonfioli F; Frau GN; van Zoest W
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():24-37. PubMed ID: 27810286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Importance of attentional mechanisms in audiovisual links.
    Dufour A
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 May; 126(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 10369144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention.
    Bertelson P; Vroomen J; de Gelder B; Driver J
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Feb; 62(2):321-32. PubMed ID: 10723211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reward expectation influences audiovisual spatial integration.
    Bruns P; Maiworm M; Röder B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Aug; 76(6):1815-27. PubMed ID: 24874263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ventriloquism effect with sound stimuli varying in both azimuth and elevation.
    Hendrickx E; Paquier M; Koehl V; Palacino J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3686-97. PubMed ID: 26723324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Illusory sound shifts induced by the ventriloquist illusion evoke the mismatch negativity.
    Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J; de Gelder B
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Mar; 357(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 15003275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of attention on early cortical processes associated with the sound-induced extra flash illusion.
    Mishra J; Martínez A; Hillyard SA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1714-29. PubMed ID: 19583464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiotactile integration is reduced in congenital blindness in a spatial ventriloquism task.
    Occelli V; Bruns P; Zampini M; Röder B
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jan; 50(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 22051726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):272-88. PubMed ID: 15068597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.