These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
34. Evidence for cue-independent spatial representation in the human auditory cortex during active listening. Higgins NC; McLaughlin SA; Rinne T; Stecker GC Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Sep; 114(36):E7602-E7611. PubMed ID: 28827357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The differential effect of vibrotactile and auditory cues on visual spatial attention. Ho C; Tan HZ; Spence C Ergonomics; 2006 Jun; 49(7):724-38. PubMed ID: 16720531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. What you saw is what you will hear: Two new illusions with audiovisual postdictive effects. Stiles NRB; Li M; Levitan CA; Kamitani Y; Shimojo S PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204217. PubMed ID: 30281629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Modulation of auditory spatial attention by visual emotional cues: differential effects of attentional engagement and disengagement for pleasant and unpleasant cues. Harrison NR; Woodhouse R Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 26842012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Optimal Audiovisual Integration in the Ventriloquism Effect But Pervasive Deficits in Unisensory Spatial Localization in Amblyopia. Richards MD; Goltz HC; Wong AMF Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Jan; 59(1):122-131. PubMed ID: 29332124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]