These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11486641)

  • 1. [Confirmatory information search in simultaneous vs. sequential information presentation].
    Jonas E; Schulz-Hardt S; Frey D
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 11486641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective exposure and information quantity: how different information quantities moderate decision makers' preference for consistent and inconsistent information.
    Fischer P; Schulz-Hardt S; Frey D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Feb; 94(2):231-44. PubMed ID: 18211174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing.
    Glöckner A; Betsch T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1055-75. PubMed ID: 18763891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: an expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information.
    Jonas E; Schulz-Hardt S; Frey D; Thelen N
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Apr; 80(4):557-71. PubMed ID: 11316221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Giving advice or making decisions in someone else's place: the influence of impression, defense, and accuracy motivation on the search for new information.
    Jonas E; Schulz-Hardt S; Frey D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Jul; 31(7):977-90. PubMed ID: 15951368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unconscious-thought effects take place off-line, not on-line.
    Strick M; Dijksterhuis A; van Baaren RB
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Apr; 21(4):484-8. PubMed ID: 20424087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Person theories and attention allocation: preferences for stereotypic versus counterstereotypic information.
    Plaks JE; Stroessner SJ; Dweck CS; Sherman JW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Jun; 80(6):876-93. PubMed ID: 11414372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of mood on the search for supporting versus conflicting information: dissonance reduction as a means of mood regulation?
    Jonas E; Graupmann V; Frey D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Jan; 32(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 16317184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-regulation and selective exposure: the impact of depleted self-regulation resources on confirmatory information processing.
    Fischer P; Greitemeyer T; Frey D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Mar; 94(3):382-95. PubMed ID: 18284288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gambles vs. quasi-realistic scenarios: expectations to find probability and risk-defusing information.
    Huber O; Huber OW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):222-36. PubMed ID: 17603987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Choosing an inferior alternative.
    Russo JE; Carlson KA; Meloy MG
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Oct; 17(10):899-904. PubMed ID: 17100791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The goal of consistency as a cause of information distortion.
    Russo JE; Carlson KA; Meloy MG; Yong K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):456-70. PubMed ID: 18729710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strategies in the information search process: interaction among task structure, knowledge, and source.
    Sacchi S; Burigo M
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jul; 135(3):252-70. PubMed ID: 18649492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Justification pressure in risky decision making: search for risk defusing operators.
    Huber O; Bär AS; Huber OW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 18986637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Connecting terror management and dissonance theory: Evidence that mortality salience increases the preference for supporting information after decisions.
    Jonas E; Greenberg J; Frey D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Sep; 29(9):1181-9. PubMed ID: 15189612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biased information search in homogeneous groups: confidence as a moderator for the effect of anticipated task requirements.
    Kerschreiter R; Schulz-Hardt S; Mojzisch A; Frey D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 May; 34(5):679-91. PubMed ID: 18310314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discretionary task interleaving: heuristics for time allocation in cognitive foraging.
    Payne SJ; Duggan GB; Neth H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):370-88. PubMed ID: 17696689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When less is enough: Cognitive aging, information search, and decision quality in consumer choice.
    Mata R; Nunes L
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Jun; 25(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 20545414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Think different: the merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making.
    Dijksterhuis A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Nov; 87(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 15535773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of routine strength on adaptation and information search in recurrent decision making.
    Betsch T; Haberstroh S; Glöckner A; Haar T; Fiedler K
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2001 Jan; 84(1):23-53. PubMed ID: 11162296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.