120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11486682)
1. Biomechanical evaluation of Hackethal's intramedullary bundle pin fixation of humeral neck fractures.
Descamps PY; Fabeck L; Krallis P; Hardy D; Delincé P
Acta Orthop Belg; 2001 Jun; 67(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 11486682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical analysis of supracondylar humerus fracture pinning for slightly malreduced fractures.
Bloom T; Robertson C; Mahar AT; Newton P
J Pediatr Orthop; 2008; 28(7):766-72. PubMed ID: 18812905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of three intramedullary pinning techniques on pin location and articular damage in the canine humerus.
Sissener TR; Jones E; Langley-Hobbs SJ
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2005; 18(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 16594446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical analysis of pinning techniques for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.
Larson L; Firoozbakhsh K; Passarelli R; Bosch P
J Pediatr Orthop; 2006; 26(5):573-8. PubMed ID: 16932093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Biomechanical study of percutaneous pinning as the treatment of proximal humerus fractures].
Jiang CY; Wang MY; Rong GW
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 42(6):343-6. PubMed ID: 15144687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhanced biomechanical stiffness with large pins in the operative treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.
Srikumaran U; Tan EW; Belkoff SM; Marsland D; Ain MC; Leet AI; Sponseller PD; Tis JE
J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Mar; 32(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 22327456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Hackethal's method of bundle nailing for proximal or diaphyseal fractures of the humerus].
Putz P; Pauwels P
Acta Orthop Belg; 1995; 61 Suppl 1():162-5. PubMed ID: 8623595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Treatment of humerus diaphyseal fractures using Hackethal's retrograde centro-medullary bundle nailing: about 54 cases].
Mohamed O; Bousbaa H; Bennani M; Cherrad T; Zejjari H; Louste J; Rachid K; Amhajji L
Pan Afr Med J; 2018; 30():38. PubMed ID: 30167065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Osteosynthesis of fractures of thr proximal end of the humerus by the screw-pin technique].
Audren JL
J Chir (Paris); 1992 Oct; 129(10):444-8. PubMed ID: 1294588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro comparison of three fixation methods for humeral fracture repair in adult horses.
Markel MD; Nunamaker DM; Wheat JD; Sams AE
Am J Vet Res; 1988 Apr; 49(4):586-93. PubMed ID: 3377322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of orthofix pins and cortical bone screws in a canine humeral condylar fracture model.
Vida JT; Pooya H; Vasseur PB; Garcia TC; Schulz K; Stover SM
Vet Surg; 2005; 34(5):491-8. PubMed ID: 16266342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Surgical fixation of humeral fractures with Hackethal's nails].
Brug E; Beck H; Marschner R
Monatsschr Unfallheilkd; 1975 Jun; 78(6):245-53. PubMed ID: 1196322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical analysis of lateral humeral condyle fracture pinning.
Bloom T; Chen LY; Sabharwal S
J Pediatr Orthop; 2011 Mar; 31(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 21307705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A biomechanical study on internal and external fixation devices for treatment of humeral shaft fracture].
Niu X; Huang F; Cen S; Qin T; Wang R; Shang Z; Liu A; Zheng H
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 May; 22(5):516-9. PubMed ID: 18630425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of different pin configurations during percutaneous pinning for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.
Jiang C; Zhu Y; Wang M; Rong G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2007; 16(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 17275352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical evaluation of the value of osteosynthesis in supracondylar fracture of the humerus using Kirschner pins in children.
Vlahović T; Bumci I
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2002 Dec; 12(6):410-5. PubMed ID: 12548495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaveric and synthetic humeri.
Siffri PC; Peindl RD; Coley ER; Norton J; Connor PM; Kellam JF
J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Sep; 20(8):547-54. PubMed ID: 16990726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fixation of humeral surgical neck fracture using contoured pins versus straight pins: a mechanical study.
Vogel G; Chechick A; Pritch Perry M; Brosh T
Int Orthop; 2007 Dec; 31(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 17043859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical analysis of pin placement for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: does starting point, pin size, and number matter?
Gottschalk HP; Sagoo D; Glaser D; Doan J; Edmonds EW; Schlechter J
J Pediatr Orthop; 2012; 32(5):445-51. PubMed ID: 22706457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
