These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11487750)

  • 1. Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols.
    Vohr BR; Oh W; Stewart EJ; Bentkover JD; Gabbard S; Lemons J; Papile LA; Pye R
    J Pediatr; 2001 Aug; 139(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 11487750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response.
    Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Ho GM; Fu TY; Bruna S; Lin G
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Newborn hearing screening: costs of establishing a program.
    Lemons J; Fanaroff A; Stewart EJ; Bentkover JD; Murray G; Diefendorf A
    J Perinatol; 2002 Mar; 22(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 11896516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs.
    Benito-Orejas JI; Ramírez B; Morais D; Almaraz A; Fernández-Calvo JL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Aug; 72(8):1193-201. PubMed ID: 18550180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Meier S; Narabayashi O; Probst R; Schmuziger N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 15183584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. reducing false positives in newborn hearing screening program: how and why.
    Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Lin HY; Lin G
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):788-92. PubMed ID: 17948357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Neonatal hearing screening. A comparison of automatic auditory brainstem audiometry and otoacoustic emissions].
    Pedersen L; Møller TR; Wetke R; Ovesen T
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Feb; 170(8):642-6. PubMed ID: 18364157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When should automatic Auditory Brainstem Response test be used for newborn hearing screening?
    Unlu I; Guclu E; Yaman H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2015 Jun; 42(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 25459495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes with OAE and AABR screening in the first 48 h--Implications for newborn hearing screening in developing countries.
    van Dyk M; Swanepoel de W; Hall JW
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jul; 79(7):1034-40. PubMed ID: 25921078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening for early detection of permanent congenital hearing loss in Lagos, Nigeria.
    Olusanya BO; Wirz SL; Luxon LM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jul; 72(7):991-1001. PubMed ID: 18433883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Universal newborn hearing screening: a 27-month experience in the French region of Champagne-Ardenne.
    Lévêque M; Schmidt P; Leroux B; Danvin JB; Langagne T; Labrousse M; Chays A
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 Aug; 96(8):1150-4. PubMed ID: 17578491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of two hearing screening protocols in NICU in Shanghai.
    Xu ZM; Cheng WX; Yang XL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Oct; 75(10):1225-9. PubMed ID: 21802153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An effective compromise between cost and referral rate: A sequential hearing screening protocol using TEOAEs and AABRs for healthy newborns.
    Shang Y; Hao W; Gao Z; Xu C; Ru Y; Ni D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 91():141-145. PubMed ID: 27863628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefits and costs of universal hearing screening programme.
    Cao-Nguyen MH; Kos MI; Guyot JP
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Oct; 71(10):1591-5. PubMed ID: 17719096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Universal newborn hearing screening: are we achieving the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) objectives?
    Connolly JL; Carron JD; Roark SD
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Feb; 115(2):232-6. PubMed ID: 15689741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Critical analysis of three newborn hearing screening protocols.
    Freitas VS; Alvarenga Kde F; Bevilacqua MC; Martinez MA; Costa OA
    Pro Fono; 2009; 21(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 19838565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An alternative strategy for universal infant hearing screening in tertiary hospitals with a high delivery rate, within a developing country, using transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions and brainstem evoked response audiometry.
    Mathur NN; Dhawan R
    J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Jul; 121(7):639-43. PubMed ID: 17112395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implementation of a nation-wide automated auditory brainstem response hearing screening programme in neonatal intensive care units.
    van Straaten HL; Hille ET; Kok JH; Verkerk PH;
    Acta Paediatr; 2003; 92(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 12725549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Costs and performance of early hearing detection programmes in Lagos, Nigeria.
    Olusanya BO; Emokpae A; Renner JK; Wirz SL
    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2009 Feb; 103(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 18814895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The exploratory study of auto-auditory brainstem response in the high-risk infants on hearing screening].
    Qi BE; Qi YS; Nie WY; Xiang LL
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Jan; 84(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 14990125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.