These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11487819)

  • 1. Intercomparison of TL dosimetry (DIMOND programme).
    Kottou S; Papadimitriou D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):125-8. PubMed ID: 11487819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of phantom materials on the energy dependence of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters exposed to 20-300 kV narrow x-ray spectra, 137Cs and 60Co photons.
    Massillon-J L G; Cabrera-Santiago A; Minniti R; O'Brien M; Soares CG
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4149-66. PubMed ID: 25004055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The response of lif thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV x rays to 60Co gamma rays.
    Davis SD; Ross CK; Mobit PN; Van der Zwan L; Chase WJ; Shortt KR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 14653324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD response as a function of photon energy for moderately filtered x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co.
    Nunn AA; Davis SD; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 18561661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thermoluminescent dosimeters for low dose X-ray measurements.
    Del Sol Fernández S; García-Salcedo R; Sánchez-Guzmán D; Ramírez-Rodríguez G; Gaona E; de León-Alfaro MA; Rivera-Montalvo T
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Jan; 107():340-345. PubMed ID: 26609683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
    Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Postal intercomparison of absorbed dose for high energy x rays with thermoluminescence dosimeters.
    Bjärngard BE; Kase KR; Rudén BI; Biggs PJ; Boyer AL; Johansson KA
    Med Phys; 1980; 7(5):560-5. PubMed ID: 6775180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Energy responses of the LiF series TL pellets to high-energy photons in the energy range from 1.25 to 21 MV.
    Kim JL; Lee JI; Ji YH; Kim BH; Kim JS; Chang SY
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):353-6. PubMed ID: 16644960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of an algorithm for TLD badge system for dosimetry in the field of X and gamma radiation in terms of Hp(10).
    Bakshi AK; Srivastava K; Varadharajan G; Pradhan AS; Kher RK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 16984896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calculated energy response correction factors for LiF thermoluminescent dosemeters employed in the seventh EULEP dosimetry intercomparison.
    Zoetelief J; Jansen JT
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Aug; 42(8):1491-504. PubMed ID: 9279901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. TL detectors for gamma ray dose measurements in criticality accidents.
    Miljanić S; Zorko B; Gregori B; Knezević Z
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):318-22. PubMed ID: 17369267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calibration of TLD badges for photons of energy above 6 MeV and dosimetric intricacies in high energy gamma ray fields encountered in nuclear power plants.
    Pradhan AS; Bakshi AK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 98(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 12018745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental studies on X- and gamma-irradiated LiCsSO4 crystals.
    Kassem ME
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2003; 59(2-3):129-32. PubMed ID: 12941501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A survey of IAEA/WHO 60Co TLD postal dose intercomparison exercises during 1985-2003.
    Salman AS; Mahmood K; Orfi SD
    Health Phys; 2005 Jul; 89(1):89-91. PubMed ID: 15951695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Measurement of personal dose equivalent of X and gamma radiation by ring dosimeter: results of intercomparison measurements].
    Adamowicz M; Papierz S; Kacprzyk J; Kamiński Z; Zmyślony M
    Med Pr; 2013; 64(5):631-7. PubMed ID: 24502126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Photon beam audits for radiation therapy clinics: a pilot mailed dosemeter study in Turkey.
    Yegingil Z; DeWerd LA; Davis SD; Hammer C; Kunugi K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 21362695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intercomparison of dosimetry systems based on CaF2:Mn TL detectors.
    Zorko B; Miljanić S; Vekić B; Stuhec M; Gobec S; Ranogajec-Komor M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):300-5. PubMed ID: 16735564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Defect analysis in natural quartz from Brazilian sites for ionising radiation dosimetry.
    Guzzo PL; Khoury HJ; Souza CP; Souza AM; Schwartz MO; Azevedo WM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):168-71. PubMed ID: 16644986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of precision thermoluminescence dosimetry for intercomparison of absorbed dose.
    Rossiter MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1975 Sep; 20(3):735-46. PubMed ID: 1187775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. IAEA TLD based audits for radiation protection calibrations at Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratories. International Atomic Energy Agency.
    Pernicka F; Meghzifene A; Tölli H; Izewska J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):275-8. PubMed ID: 12382751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.