These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11487841)
1. Equipment requirements and specification for digital and interventional radiology. Zoetelief J; Faulkner K Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):43-8. PubMed ID: 11487841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality control of equipment used in digital and interventional radiology. Zoetelief J; van Soldt RT; Suliman II; Jansen JT; Bosmans H Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):277-82. PubMed ID: 16461518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Review of acceptability criteria for X ray systems relevant for digital radiology. Zoetelief J Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 11487844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ACR-NEMA digital imaging and communications standards: minimum requirements. Wang Y; Best DE; Hoffman JG; Horii SC; Lehr JL; Lodwick GS; Morse RR; Murphy LL; Nelson OL; Perry J Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 3336730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Medical electrical equipment - part 2-43: particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment for interventional procedures]. Miyake Et Al H Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(3):298-301. PubMed ID: 21471688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of the medical physicist in interventional radiology. Wallace AB Australas Radiol; 1999 May; 43(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 10901891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Absorbed dose and deterministic effects to patients from interventional neuroradiology. Mooney RB; McKinstry CS; Kamel HA Br J Radiol; 2000 Jul; 73(871):745-51. PubMed ID: 11089467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A review of image quality and dose issues in digital fluorography and digital subtraction angiography. Kotre CJ; Marshall NW Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):73-6. PubMed ID: 11487847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose and image quality in digital imaging and interventional radiology (DIMOND. Proceedings of a workshop. Dublin, Ireland, June 24-26, 1999. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):1-199. PubMed ID: 11525180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography. Peer S; Peer R; Giacomuzzi SM; Jaschke W Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):69-71. PubMed ID: 11487846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flat panels advance IR and digital fluoro. Cook A; Cook A; Hevezi J Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1998 Nov; Suppl Digital X():7-8, 23. PubMed ID: 10345147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Criteria to optimise a dynamic flat detector system used for interventional radiology. Simon R; Vano E; Prieto C; Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Martinez D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):261-4. PubMed ID: 18304958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor. Lin PJ Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Radiological technologists view about dose reduction techniques in interventional radiology]. Yamaguchi K; Sato K; Nakanishi S Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Jun; 62(7):352-5. PubMed ID: 12136634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The requirements for equipment outfitting and hygiene in interventional radiology]. Richter GM Rofo; 1997 Mar; 166(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 9156585 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A Standardized Exposure Index for Digital Radiography. Brake DA Radiol Technol; 2016 May; 87(5):581-5. PubMed ID: 27146186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]