122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11487994)
1. Feedback from participants and leaders in an intervention program: the 1997-1998 opening doors process evaluation.
Rye BJ; Humpartzoomian R; Steep B
J Drug Educ; 2001; 31(2):185-206. PubMed ID: 11487994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the All Stars Program: student and teacher factors that influence mediators of substance use.
Giles SM; Harrington NG; Fearnow-Kenney M
J Drug Educ; 2001; 31(4):385-97. PubMed ID: 11957393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Framework for Supporting Adolescent Peer Leaders: A Pilot Using Text Messaging in a School-Based Substance Use Prevention Program.
Pisani AR; Wyman PA; Petrova M; Judd E; Schmeelk-Cone K; Thiha P; Gurditta K
J Prim Prev; 2019 Apr; 40(2):243-254. PubMed ID: 30827007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Family-based drug use prevention: the "Familias que Funcionan" ["Families that Work"] program].
Errasti Pérez JM; Al-Halabí Díaz S; Secades Villa R; Fernández-Hermida JR; Carballo JL; García-Rodríguez O
Psicothema; 2009 Feb; 21(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 19178855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spreading the word: A process evaluation of a voluntary AOD prevention program.
Edelen MO; Tucker J; D'Amico E
Am J Addict; 2015 Jun; 24(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 25846206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. based on the client satisfaction approach: view of the students.
Shek DT; Law MY
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 27 Suppl():S2-9. PubMed ID: 24792759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implementation of a cluster randomized controlled trial: Identifying student peer leaders to lead E-cigarette interventions.
Chu KH; Sidani J; Matheny S; Rothenberger SD; Miller E; Valente T; Robertson L
Addict Behav; 2021 Mar; 114():106726. PubMed ID: 33278717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Results of a rural school-based peer-led intervention for youth: goals for health.
Forneris T; Fries E; Meyer A; Buzzard M; Uguy S; Ramakrishnan R; Lewis C; Danish S
J Sch Health; 2010 Feb; 80(2):57-65. PubMed ID: 20236403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Process evaluation of the implementation of the Unplugged Program for drug use prevention in Brazilian schools.
Medeiros PF; Cruz JI; R Schneider D; Sanudo A; Sanchez ZM
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2016 Jan; 11():2. PubMed ID: 26739461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A peer education program: delivering highly reliable sexual health promotion messages in schools.
Layzer C; Rosapep L; Barr S
J Adolesc Health; 2014 Mar; 54(3 Suppl):S70-7. PubMed ID: 24560080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlates of perceived effectiveness of the Safe Schools/Healthy Students Initiative.
Ellis B; Alford A; Yu P; Xiong S; Hill G; Puckett M; Mannix D; Wells ME
Eval Program Plann; 2012 May; 35(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 22142869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term mediating factors of a school-based intervention to prevent youth substance use in Europe.
Giannotta F; Vigna-Taglianti F; Rosaria Galanti M; Scatigna M; Faggiano F
J Adolesc Health; 2014 May; 54(5):565-73. PubMed ID: 24332392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cluster randomized controlled trial of school-based prevention of tobacco, alcohol and drug use: the EU-Dap design and study population.
Faggiano F; Richardson C; Bohrn K; Galanti MR;
Prev Med; 2007 Feb; 44(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 17084887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effective methods to improve recruitment and retention in school-based substance use prevention studies.
Bruzzese JM; Gallagher R; McCann-Doyle S; Reiss PT; Wijetunga NA
J Sch Health; 2009 Sep; 79(9):400-7. PubMed ID: 19691714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of a school health coordinator intervention on health-related school policies and student behavior.
O'Brien LM; Polacsek M; Macdonald PB; Ellis J; Berry S; Martin M
J Sch Health; 2010 Apr; 80(4):176-85. PubMed ID: 20433643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parents' perceptions of a school-based prevention education program.
Donnermeyer JF
J Drug Educ; 2000; 30(3):325-42. PubMed ID: 11092152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Self-Reported Engagement in a Drug Prevention Program: Individual and Classroom Effects on Proximal and Behavioral Outcomes.
Hansen WB; Fleming CB; Scheier LM
J Prim Prev; 2019 Feb; 40(1):5-34. PubMed ID: 30631997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parent participation in an adolescent drug abuse prevention program.
Cohen DA; Linton KL
J Drug Educ; 1995; 25(2):159-69. PubMed ID: 7658296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrating life skills into a theory-based drug-use prevention program: effectiveness among junior high students in Taiwan.
Huang CM; Chien LY; Cheng CF; Guo JL
J Sch Health; 2012 Jul; 82(7):328-35. PubMed ID: 22671949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 5-2-1-0 goes to school: a pilot project testing the feasibility of schools adopting and delivering healthy messages during the school day.
Rogers VW; Motyka E
Pediatrics; 2009 Jun; 123 Suppl 5():S272-6. PubMed ID: 19470603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
