These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

42 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11488196)

  • 1. The technological edge.
    Furness J
    Med Device Technol; 2001 Jun; 12(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 11488196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast tomosynthesis.
    Buzek N
    Adv Nurse Pract; 2009 Oct; 17(10):25-6, 28. PubMed ID: 20000159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evolution of breast cancer screening in countries with intermediate and increasing incidence of breast cancer.
    Wu GH; Chen LS; Chang KJ; Hou MF; Chen SC; Liu TJ; Huang CS; Hsu GC; Yu CC; Jeng LL; Chen ST; Chou YH; Wu CY; Shin-Lan K; Chen TH;
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S23-7. PubMed ID: 17227638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morpho-functional visualization of dynamic MR-mammography.
    Englmeier KH; Hellwig G; Griebel J; Delorme S; Siebert M; Brix G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):838-41. PubMed ID: 15360930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Introducing DeBRa: a detailed breast model for radiological studies.
    Ma AK; Gunn S; Darambara DG
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(14):4533-45. PubMed ID: 19556683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
    Duarte GM; Cabello C; Torresan RZ; Alvarenga M; Telles GH; Bianchessi ST; Caserta N; Segala SR; de Lima Mda C; Etchebehere EC; Camargo EE; Tinois E
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subtraction of in-phase and opposed-phase images in dynamic MR mammography.
    Reichenbach JR; Hopfe J; Rauscher A; Wurdinger S; Kaiser WA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 21(5):565-75. PubMed ID: 15834904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast cancer incidence and mortality in the Nordic capitals, 1970-1998. Trends related to mammography screening programmes.
    Törnberg S; Kemetli L; Lynge E; Helene Olsen A; Hofvind S; Wang H; Anttila A; Hakama M; Nyström L
    Acta Oncol; 2006; 45(5):528-35. PubMed ID: 16864165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3D programme, Sunday August 2, on screening mammography.
    Campbell I
    N Z Med J; 2015 Sep; 128(1421):82-4. PubMed ID: 26370767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast cancer screening gets better.
    Johns Hopkins Med Lett Health After 50; 2007 Nov; 19(9):4-5. PubMed ID: 18418943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New approaches to the imaging, diagnosis, and biopsy of breast lesions.
    Esserman LJ
    Cancer J; 2002; 8 Suppl 1():S1-14. PubMed ID: 12075695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A dynamic infrared imaging-based diagnostic process for breast cancer.
    Joro R; Lääperi AL; Dastidar P; Järvenpää R; Kuukasjärvi T; Toivonen T; Saaristo R; Soimakallio S
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Oct; 50(8):860-9. PubMed ID: 19636984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Combination of low and high resolution T1-weighted sequences for improved evaluation of morphologic criteria in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast].
    Vomweg TW; Teifke A; Schreiber WG; Schmidt M; Thelen M
    Rofo; 2002 Nov; 174(11):1445-9. PubMed ID: 12424673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advanced integrated technique in breast cancer thermography.
    Ng EY; Kee EC
    J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 17852648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computerized analysis of tissue density effect on missed cancer detection in digital mammography.
    Li L; Wu Z; Salem A; Chen Z; Chen L; George F; Kallergi M; Berman C
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006 Jul; 30(5):291-7. PubMed ID: 16837164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital breast tomosynthesis: the future of mammography screening or much ado about nothing?
    Houssami N; Zackrisson S
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2013 Sep; 10(5):583-5. PubMed ID: 24053250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional optical tomographic imaging of breast in a human subject.
    Jiang H; Xu Y; Iftimia N; Eggert J; Klove K; Baron L; Fajardo L
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1334-40. PubMed ID: 11811833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast MR segmentation and lesion detection with cellular neural networks and 3D template matching.
    Ertaş G; Gülçür HO; Osman O; Uçan ON; Tunaci M; Dursun M
    Comput Biol Med; 2008 Jan; 38(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 17854795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Full-field digital mammography compared with screen-film mammography in the detection of breast cancer: rays of light through DMIST or more fog?
    Tice JA; Feldman MD
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jan; 107(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 17377840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.
    Riedl CC; Ponhold L; Flöry D; Weber M; Kroiss R; Wagner T; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.