124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11488873)
1. Invited commentary--Rapid review: current practice.
Faraker CA
Cytopathology; 2001 Aug; 12(4):249-50. PubMed ID: 11488873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical cytology EQA--the Northern experience.
Llewellyn H
Cytopathology; 2001 Aug; 12(4):272-3. PubMed ID: 11512548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical cytology EQA--the Northern experience.
Slater DN; Hewer EM; Melling SE; Rice S
Cytopathology; 2001 Aug; 12(4):273-4. PubMed ID: 11512549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity of primary screening by rapid review: 'to act or not to act on the results, that is the question'.
Slater DN
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 9577733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rapid review.
Faraker CA
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 9660635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The sensitivity of rapid (partial) review of cervical smears.
Shield PW; Cox NC
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 9577734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rapid screening: a comparative study.
Dudding N; Hewer EM; Lancucki L; Rice S
Cytopathology; 2001 Aug; 12(4):235-48. PubMed ID: 11488872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control. For how long should we rescreen?
Farrell DJ; Bilkhu S; Gibson LM; Cummings L; Wadehra V
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 9100751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rapid rescreening.
Rubin A
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):141-2. PubMed ID: 9577744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [An operative model: verification of the quality of the screening Pap test ].
Montanari GR; Arnaud S; Berardengo E; Campione D; Cozzani C; Parisio F; Viberti L; Ghiringhello B
Pathologica; 2001 Oct; 93(5):609-10. PubMed ID: 11725370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Internal quality assurance of sensitivity of primary screening.
Boxer ME
Cytopathology; 1998 Oct; 9(5):349-50. PubMed ID: 9800134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Partial rescreening of all negative smears: an improved method of quality assurance in laboratories undertaking cervical screening.
Faraker CA
Cytopathology; 1993; 4(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 8453016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proposed guidelines for secondary screening (rescreening) instruments for gynecologic cytology. Intersociety Working Group for Cytology Technologies.
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):273-6. PubMed ID: 9479352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Improvement in the routine screening of cervical smears: A study using rapid prescreening and 100% rapid review as internal quality control methods.
Tavares SB; Alves de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; Pinheiro de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
Cancer Cytopathol; 2011 Dec; 119(6):367-76. PubMed ID: 21954191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Management of suboptimal cytologic smears: persistent inflammatory smears.
Vassilakos P
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(6):1481. PubMed ID: 9850666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid (partial) prescreening of cervical smears: the quality control method of choice?
Brooke D; Dudding N; Sutton J
Cytopathology; 2002 Aug; 13(4):191-9. PubMed ID: 12269891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Internal quality control for cervical cytopathology laboratories.
Coleman DV
Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 8833867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology.
Dalla Palma P
Cytopathology; 1997 Jun; 8(3):210. PubMed ID: 9202897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Actual procedures in evaluation of the uterine cervix lesions.
Bauer H
Ginekol Pol; 1988 Aug; 59(8):462-5. PubMed ID: 3254301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; Kobler TP; Koss LG; Mitchell H; Perey R; Rosenthal DL; Sidoti MS; Somrak TM
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. PubMed ID: 9479326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
