These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11490060)

  • 1. [Epidemiological studies in evaluation of effectiveness of health promotion programmes].
    Szamotulska K
    Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2000; 4(4 Suppl 1):67-74. PubMed ID: 11490060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluation of health promotion programmes].
    Berkowska M; Sito A
    Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2000; 4(4 Suppl 1):27-41. PubMed ID: 11490057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meeting the challenges of implementing process evaluation within randomized controlled trials: the example of ASSIST (A Stop Smoking in Schools Trial).
    Audrey S; Holliday J; Parry-Langdon N; Campbell R
    Health Educ Res; 2006 Jun; 21(3):366-77. PubMed ID: 16740670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Qualitative research in evaluation of health promotion programs in the context of health and disease paradigms].
    Sochocki MJ; Sito A
    Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2003; 7(1 Pt 2):13-33. PubMed ID: 14704488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial.
    Hawe P; Shiell A; Riley T; Gold L
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Sep; 58(9):788-93. PubMed ID: 15310806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Community-based health promotion--a challenge for the evaluation].
    Loss J; Eichhorn C; Gehlert J; Donhauser J; Wise M; Nagel E
    Gesundheitswesen; 2007 Feb; 69(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 17405079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Elaboration and evaluation of mental health promotion programmes exemplified by a primary prevention alcohol programme].
    Okulicz-Kozaryn K; Borucka A
    Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2000; 4(4 Suppl 1):171-87. PubMed ID: 11490068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Designs and methods used in published Australian health promotion evaluations 1992-2011.
    Chambers AH; Murphy K; Kolbe A
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Jun; 39(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 25903801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of focus groups in health research.
    Ramirez AG; Shepperd J
    Scand J Prim Health Care Suppl; 1988; 1():81-90. PubMed ID: 3227205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Epidemiological methods for evaluating screening programmes].
    Olsen J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2014 Jun; 176(12):. PubMed ID: 25096938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attempting to set up a randomised controlled trial.
    Ellis L; Davies S; Laker S
    Nurs Stand; 2000 Feb 9-15; 14(21):32-6. PubMed ID: 11971305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Health promotion. Concept development].
    Sito A; Berkowska M
    Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2000; 4(4 Suppl 1):13-25. PubMed ID: 11490056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Free breakfasts in schools: design and conduct of a cluster randomised controlled trial of the Primary School Free Breakfast Initiative in Wales [ISRCTN18336527].
    Moore L; Moore GF; Tapper K; Lynch R; Desousa C; Hale J; Roberts C; Murphy S
    BMC Public Health; 2007 Sep; 7():258. PubMed ID: 17888158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Qualitative technics for social sciences--focus group interview for evaluation of health promotion programs and prevention of problems with adolescents].
    Sochocki MJ
    Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2000; 4(4 Suppl 1):81-8. PubMed ID: 11490062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating health promotion: a tale of three errors.
    Tones K
    Patient Educ Couns; 2000 Feb; 39(2-3):227-36. PubMed ID: 11040722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpreting sexually transmissible infection prevention trials by adjusting for the magnitude of exposure.
    Wilson DP
    Clin Trials; 2010 Feb; 7(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 20007407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preffi 2.0- a quality assessment tool.
    Molleman GR; Ploeg MA; Hosman CM; Peters LH
    Promot Educ; 2006; 13(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 16969998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beyond process and outcome evaluation: a comprehensive approach for evaluating health promotion programmes.
    Potvin L; Haddad S; Frohlich KL
    WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):45-62. PubMed ID: 11729783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Preffi 2.0: a Dutch instrument to analyse the effectiveness of health promotion interventions].
    Molleman GR; Ploeg MA; Hosman CM; Peters L
    Promot Educ; 2004; Spec no 1():22-7, 49. PubMed ID: 15551691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performative evaluation and social return on investment: potential in innovative health promotion interventions.
    Gibson J; Jones A; Travers H; Hunter E
    Australas Psychiatry; 2011 Jul; 19 Suppl 1():S53-7. PubMed ID: 21878020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.