These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 114908)

  • 1. Superior ultra-audiometric hearing: a new type of hearing loss which correlates highly with unusually good speech in the "profoundly deaf".
    Berlin CI; Wexler KF; Jerger JF; Halperin HR; Smith S
    Otolaryngology; 1978; 86(1):ORL-111-6. PubMed ID: 114908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aided cortical response, speech intelligibility, consonant perception and functional performance of young children using conventional amplification or nonlinear frequency compression.
    Zhang VW; Ching TY; Van Buynder P; Hou S; Flynn C; Burns L; McGhie K; Wong AO
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Oct; 78(10):1692-700. PubMed ID: 25128447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Some relationships between hearing aid frequency response and speech discrimination of profoundly deaf children. Pilot study.
    Dyrlund O
    Scand Audiol; 1988; 17(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 3232020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intelligibility of hearing impaired children as judged by their parents: A comparison between children using cochlear implants and children using hearing aids.
    Baudonck N; Dhooge I; Van Lierde K
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Nov; 74(11):1310-5. PubMed ID: 20833437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing implants with hearing aids in profoundly deaf children.
    Geers AE
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 117(3 Pt 1):150-4. PubMed ID: 9334758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech intelligibility and subjective benefit in single-sided deaf adults after cochlear implantation.
    Finke M; Strauß-Schier A; Kludt E; Büchner A; Illg A
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():112-119. PubMed ID: 28286233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Analysis of word perception in deaf children. A longitudinal study].
    Hélias J; Chaurand A; Lafon JC
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1990; 111(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 2281213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochlear implant in patients with residual hearing.
    Shiomi Y; Naito Y; Honjo I; Fujiki N; Kaneko K; Takahashi H; Yamashita M; Kawano M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1999 Oct; 26(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 10530732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception and speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation.
    Calmels MN; Saliba I; Wanna G; Cochard N; Fillaux J; Deguine O; Fraysse B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Mar; 68(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 15129946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A modification of play audiometry to assess speech discrimination ability in severe-profoundly deaf 2- to 4-year-old children.
    Dawson PW; Nott PE; Clark GM; Cowan RS
    Ear Hear; 1998 Oct; 19(5):371-84. PubMed ID: 9796646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Children with implants can speak, but can they communicate?
    Robbins AM; Svirsky M; Kirk KI
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 117(3 Pt 1):155-60. PubMed ID: 9334759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.
    Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability, sensitivity and validity of magnitude estimation, category scaling and paired-comparison judgements of speech intelligibility by older listeners.
    Purdy SC; Pavlovic CV
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):254-71. PubMed ID: 1482505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The structure of segmental errors in the speech of deaf children.
    Levitt H; Stromberg H; Smith C; Gold T
    J Commun Disord; 1980 Dec; 13(6):419-41. PubMed ID: 7451672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The speech of adults with acquired profound hearing losses. I: A perceptual evaluation.
    Plant G
    Eur J Disord Commun; 1993; 28(3):273-88. PubMed ID: 8241582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech production changes with the use of a multichannel cochlear implant in a postlingually hearing impaired adult.
    Cummings S; Groenewald E; Hugo R; Müller L; van der Linde M
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 1994; 41():3-13. PubMed ID: 8602540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech discrimination and intelligibility: outcome of deaf children fitted with hearing aids or cochlear implants.
    Lejeune B; Demanez L
    B-ENT; 2006; 2(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 16910289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noise-induced hearing loss and the comprehension of speech in noise.
    Quist-Hanssen S; Thorud E; Aasand G
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1979; 360():90-5. PubMed ID: 287364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids.
    Osberger MJ; Maso M; Sam LK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 36(1):186-203. PubMed ID: 8450658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of speech perception abilities of profoundly deaf children: a comparison between children with cochlear implants and those with conventional hearing aids.
    Vermeulen AM; Beijk CM; Brokx JP; van den Borne S; van den Broek P
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():215-7. PubMed ID: 7668642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.