These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11493417)

  • 21. [Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome].
    Lorenzen J; Wedel AK; Lisboa BW; Löning T; Adam G
    Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1545-51. PubMed ID: 16302136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Breast Sonography and Mammography: Complementarity and Correlation.
    Faguy K
    Radiol Technol; 2017 Sep; 89(1):45M-64M. PubMed ID: 28904171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. 99mTc-MIBI prone scintimammography in patients with high and intermediate risk mammography.
    Scopinaro F; Ierardi M; Porfiri LM; Tiberio NS; De Vincentis G; Mezi S; Cannas P; Gigliotti T; Marzetti L
    Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(3B):1635-8. PubMed ID: 9179209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Management of breast problems in gynecologic office practice using sonography and fine-needle aspiration.
    Nyirjesy I; Billingsley FS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 May; 79(5 ( Pt 1)):699-702. PubMed ID: 1565351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging.
    Hlawatsch A; Teifke A; Schmidt M; Thelen M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1493-501. PubMed ID: 12438043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Relative and combined performance of mammography and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in the general population: a pilot study in Tochigi Prefecture, Japan.
    Honjo S; Ando J; Tsukioka T; Morikubo H; Ichimura M; Sunagawa M; Hasegawa T; Watanabe T; Kodama T; Tominaga K; Sasagawa M; Koyama Y
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 Sep; 37(9):715-20. PubMed ID: 17766996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Diseases of the female breast: screening, mammography, ultrasound].
    Otto RC
    Ther Umsch; 1993 May; 50(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 8378888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Screening, imaging, and image-guided biopsy techniques for breast cancer.
    Smetherman DH
    Surg Clin North Am; 2013 Apr; 93(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 23464688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue.
    Kaplan SS
    Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):641-9. PubMed ID: 11719658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
    Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a review of 2,420 cases with long-term follow-up.
    Youk JH; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Oh KK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jan; 190(1):202-7. PubMed ID: 18094312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate.
    Lee CH; Philpotts LE; Horvath LJ; Tocino I
    Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 10405741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Benign breast lesions mimicking carcinoma at mammography.
    Pojchamarnwiputh S; Muttarak M; Na-Chiangmai W; Chaiwun B
    Singapore Med J; 2007 Oct; 48(10):958-68. PubMed ID: 17909685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Present-day diagnostic techniques in breast nodes].
    Sovtsov SA; Mikhaĭlova SA
    Ter Arkh; 1998; 70(10):42-6. PubMed ID: 9864803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mammography and early breast cancer detection.
    Bassett LW; Butler DL
    Am Fam Physician; 1991 Feb; 43(2):547-57. PubMed ID: 1990738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. False-positive mammographic imaging of a breast implant.
    Cucin R; Bard R
    N Y State J Med; 1993 Feb; 93(2):151-2. PubMed ID: 8455835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Needle localization and biopsy in non-palpable lesions of the breast: an eight-year experience.
    Laraja RD; Rothenberg RE; Herbert L; Pryce EH
    N Y State J Med; 1992 Feb; 92(2):71. PubMed ID: 1314357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Adjunctive diagnostic value of ultrasonography evaluation in patients with suspected ductal breast disease.
    Ballesio L; Maggi C; Savelli S; Angeletti M; Rabuffi P; Manganaro L; Porfiri LM
    Radiol Med; 2007 Apr; 112(3):354-65. PubMed ID: 17440697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis of patients with false negative mammography and symptomatic breast carcinoma.
    Murphy IG; Dillon MF; Doherty AO; McDermott EW; Kelly G; O'Higgins N; Hill AD
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Nov; 96(6):457-63. PubMed ID: 17929256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Solid breast lesions: diagnosis with US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
    Gordon PB; Goldenberg SL; Chan NH
    Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):573-80. PubMed ID: 8210392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.