70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11493421)
1. Architectural-based interpretations of breast MR imaging.
Nunes LW
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2001 May; 9(2):303-20, vi. PubMed ID: 11493421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study.
Schnall MD; Blume J; Bluemke DA; DeAngelis GA; DeBruhl N; Harms S; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hylton N; Kuhl CK; Pisano ED; Causer P; Schnitt SJ; Thickman D; Stelling CB; Weatherall PT; Lehman C; Gatsonis CA
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 16373758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A combined architectural and kinetic interpretation model for breast MR images.
Schnall MD; Rosten S; Englander S; Orel SG; Nunes LW
Acad Radiol; 2001 Jul; 8(7):591-7. PubMed ID: 11450959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features.
Goto M; Ito H; Akazawa K; Kubota T; Kizu O; Yamada K; Nishimura T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results.
Pinker K; Grabner G; Bogner W; Gruber S; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S; Heinz-Peer G; Weber M; Fitzal F; Pluschnig U; Rudas M; Helbich T
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 19652611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-spatial-resolution MR imaging of focal breast masses: interpretation model based on kinetic and morphological parameters.
Tozaki M; Igarashi T; Matsushima S; Fukuda K
Radiat Med; 2005 Feb; 23(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15786751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gadobenate dimeglumine as a contrast agent for dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging: effect of higher initial enhancement thresholds on diagnostic performance.
Sardanelli F; Fausto A; Esseridou A; Di Leo G; Kirchin MA
Invest Radiol; 2008 Apr; 43(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 18340247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An overview of interpretation strategies for breast MR imaging.
Schnall MD
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2001 May; 9(2):289-94, v-vi. PubMed ID: 11493419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging.
Moon M; Cornfeld D; Weinreb J
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2009 May; 17(2):351-62. PubMed ID: 19406363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Probably benign lesions at breast magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience in high-risk women.
Liberman L; Morris EA; Benton CL; Abramson AF; Dershaw DD
Cancer; 2003 Jul; 98(2):377-88. PubMed ID: 12872360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis of adrenal adenomas and malignant adrenal masses.
Inan N; Arslan A; Akansel G; Anik Y; Balci NC; Demirci A
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):154-62. PubMed ID: 17466481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benign versus malignant compression fracture: a diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging.
Pongpornsup S; Wajanawichakorn P; Danchaivijitr N
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jan; 92(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 19260246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between lesion size and signal enhancement on subtraction fat-suppressed MR imaging of the breast.
Cheung HS; Tse GM; Lai SY; Yeung DK
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 22(9):1259-64. PubMed ID: 15607097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Combination of low and high resolution T1-weighted sequences for improved evaluation of morphologic criteria in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast].
Vomweg TW; Teifke A; Schreiber WG; Schmidt M; Thelen M
Rofo; 2002 Nov; 174(11):1445-9. PubMed ID: 12424673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concepts for differential diagnosis in breast MR imaging.
Kuhl CK
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Aug; 14(3):305-28, v. PubMed ID: 17098173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR imaging-guided interventions in the breast.
Lo LD; Orel SG; Schnall MD
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2001 May; 9(2):373-80, vii. PubMed ID: 11493426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging of benign phyllodes tumors of the breast.
Kinoshita T; Fukutomi T; Kubochi K
Breast J; 2004; 10(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 15125750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The breast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI: preliminary results of a quantitative analysis.
Di Nallo AM; Crecco M; Ortenzia O; Ordonez R; Abate A; Benassi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Jun; 26(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 17725104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]