167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11494193)
1. Monitoring in-shoe plantar pressures, temperature, and humidity: reliability and validity of measures from a portable device.
Maluf KS; Morley RE; Richter EJ; Klaesner JW; Mueller MJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Aug; 82(8):1119-27. PubMed ID: 11494193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In-shoe multisensory data acquisition system.
Morley RE; Richter EJ; Klaesner JW; Maluf KS; Mueller MJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Jul; 48(7):815-20. PubMed ID: 11442293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Plantar pressure in off-loading devices used in diabetic ulcer treatment.
Beuker BJ; van Deursen RW; Price P; Manning EA; van Baal JG; Harding KG
Wound Repair Regen; 2005; 13(6):537-42. PubMed ID: 16283868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Plantar pressure relief in the diabetic foot using forefoot offloading shoes.
Bus SA; van Deursen RW; Kanade RV; Wissink M; Manning EA; van Baal JG; Harding KG
Gait Posture; 2009 Jun; 29(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 19217785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vacuum cushioned removable cast walkers reduce foot loading in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Nagel A; Rosenbaum D
Gait Posture; 2009 Jul; 30(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 19321342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of orthotic devices prescribed using pressure data on lower extremity kinematics and pressures beneath the shoe during running.
Dixon SJ; McNally K
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Jun; 23(5):593-600. PubMed ID: 18355949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The efficacy of a removable vacuum-cushioned cast replacement system in reducing plantar forefoot pressures in diabetic patients.
Bus SA; Waaijman R; Arts M; Manning H
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jun; 24(5):459-64. PubMed ID: 19303180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Measuring plantar pressure in conventional shoes with the TEKSCAN sensory system].
Koch M
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1993 Oct; 38(10):243-8. PubMed ID: 8268402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Local plantar pressure relief in therapeutic footwear: design guidelines from finite element models.
Erdemir A; Saucerman JJ; Lemmon D; Loppnow B; Turso B; Ulbrecht JS; Cavanagh PR
J Biomech; 2005 Sep; 38(9):1798-806. PubMed ID: 16023466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of neutral-cushioned running shoes on plantar pressure loading and comfort in athletes with cavus feet: a crossover randomized controlled trial.
Wegener C; Burns J; Penkala S
Am J Sports Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):2139-46. PubMed ID: 18577583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Custom therapeutic insoles based on both foot shape and plantar pressure measurement provide enhanced pressure relief.
Owings TM; Woerner JL; Frampton JD; Cavanagh PR; Botek G
Diabetes Care; 2008 May; 31(5):839-44. PubMed ID: 18252899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in-shoe device to measure plantar pressure during daily human activity.
Saito M; Nakajima K; Takano C; Ohta Y; Sugimoto C; Ezoe R; Sasaki K; Hosaka H; Ifukube T; Ino S; Yamashita K
Med Eng Phys; 2011 Jun; 33(5):638-45. PubMed ID: 21310644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of insole configurations on forefoot plantar pressure and walking convenience in diabetic patients with neuropathic feet.
Guldemond NA; Leffers P; Schaper NC; Sanders AP; Nieman F; Willems P; Walenkamp GH
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 17046124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In-shoe plantar pressure measurement and analysis system based on fabric pressure sensing array.
Shu L; Hua T; Wang Y; Qiao Li Q; Feng DD; Tao X
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2010 May; 14(3):767-75. PubMed ID: 20071266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Critical steps in electronic volume quantification of gingival crevicular fluid: the potential impact of evaporation, fluid retention, local conditions and repeated measurements.
Tözüm TF; Hatipoğlu H; Yamalik N; Gürsel M; Alptekin NO; Ataoğlu T; Marakoğlu I; Gürsoy UK; Eratalay K
J Periodontal Res; 2004 Oct; 39(5):344-57. PubMed ID: 15324356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the two-step and midgait methods of plantar pressure measurement in children.
Oladeji O; Stackhouse C; Gracely E; Orlin M
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2008; 98(4):268-77. PubMed ID: 18685046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Classification and mass production technique for three-quarter shoe insoles using non-weight-bearing plantar shapes.
Sun SP; Chou YJ; Sue CC
Appl Ergon; 2009 Jul; 40(4):630-5. PubMed ID: 18620334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Holter-type, microprocessor-based, rehabilitation instrument for acquisition and storage of plantar pressure data.
Abu-Faraj ZO; Harris GF; Abler JH; Wertsch JJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1997 Apr; 34(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 9108345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of plantar pressure distribution patterns between foot orthoses provided by the CAD-CAM and foam impression methods.
Ki SW; Leung AK; Li AN
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Sep; 32(3):356-62. PubMed ID: 18677672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing plantar pressure in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of running versus off-the-shelf orthopaedic footwear.
Hennessy K; Burns J; Penkala S
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Oct; 22(8):917-23. PubMed ID: 17582663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
