These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11494462)
1. Marginal adaptation of three Class II composite restorative techniques in vitro. Papthanasiou A; Bardwell D J Mass Dent Soc; 2001; 50(2):30-2. PubMed ID: 11494462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite. de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. Ozturk N; Aykent F J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Curing units' ability to cure restorative composites and dual-cured composite cements under composite overlay. Park SH; Kim SS; Cho YS; Lee CK; Noh BD Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 15646217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations. Owens BM J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of light curing units on marginal adaptation and hardness of Class II composite resin restorations. Cavalcante LM; Peris AR; Silikas N; Pimenta LA J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov; 8(7):38-45. PubMed ID: 17994153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations. Attar N; Korkmaz Y J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage. Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations. Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of marginal fit of class II ceromer inlays. Gemalmaz D; Kükrer D J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 33(6):436-42. PubMed ID: 16671990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites. Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers. Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations. Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dimensional stability of two visible light-cured indirect inlay/onlay resin composite materials. Lynde TA; Schulman LB; Meiers JC; Whitehill JM Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):153-6. PubMed ID: 9002790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of photoactivation systems and resin composites on the microleakage of esthetic restorations. Cavalcante LM; Peris AR; Ambrosano GM; Ritter AV; Pimenta LA J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):70-9. PubMed ID: 17277829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage and adaptation of Class II packable resin-based composites using incremental or bulk filling techniques. Gallo JR; Bates ML; Burgess JO Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):205-8. PubMed ID: 11763932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective randomised clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: three-year results. Bottenberg P; Alaerts M; Keulemans F J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 16963171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement. Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of adhesive luting systems on bond strength and failure mode of an indirect micro ceramic resin-based composite veneer. Sarabi N; Ghavamnasiri M; Forooghbakhsh A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19142254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage of a new improved glass ionomer restorative material in primary and permanent teeth. Castro A; Feigal RE Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 11874054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]