BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11494938)

  • 1. TOMAC: an orthognathic treatment planning system. Part 1 soft-tissue analysis.
    McCollum TG
    J Clin Orthod; 2001 Jun; 35(6):356-64. PubMed ID: 11494938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. TOMAC: an orthognathic treatment planning system. Part 3. VTO construction in the vertical dimension.
    McCollum TG
    J Clin Orthod; 2001 Aug; 35(8):478-90. PubMed ID: 11589094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The optical surface scan as an alternative to the cephalograph for soft tissue analysis for orthognathic surgery.
    Soncul M; Bamber MA
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 10895642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soft tissue changes associated with orthognathic surgery.
    Betts NJ; Dowd KF
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2000 Sep; 8(2):13-38. PubMed ID: 11212555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of the dynamic volume spline method to predict facial soft tissue changes associated with orthognathic surgery.
    Ulusoy I; Akagunduz E; Sabuncuoglu F; Gorgulu S; Ucok O
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Nov; 110(5):e17-23. PubMed ID: 20955940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
    Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immediate postoperative outcome of orthognathic surgical planning, and prediction of positional changes in hard and soft tissue, independently of the extent and direction of the surgical corrections required.
    Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 49(5):386-91. PubMed ID: 20621403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles in Le Fort I osteotomy patients with Dolphin and Maxilim softwares.
    Nadjmi N; Tehranchi A; Azami N; Saedi B; Mollemans W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):654-62. PubMed ID: 24182581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.
    Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 19761914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional and aesthetic endpoints in orthognathic surgery.
    Elsalanty ME; Genecov DG; Genecov JS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 18(4):725-33. PubMed ID: 17667657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical orthodontic treatment planning: profile analysis and mandibular surgery.
    Worms FW; Isaacson RJ; Speidel TM
    Angle Orthod; 1976 Jan; 46(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 766671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The surgical sequence of combined total maxillary and mandibular osteotomies.
    Gross BD; James RB
    J Oral Surg; 1978 Jul; 36(7):513-22. PubMed ID: 277635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [An interview with the maxillofacial surgeon G. William Arnett. Interview by Colette Orival-Demange].
    Arnett GW
    Orthod Fr; 1998; 69(1):211-24. PubMed ID: 9643047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporation of facial plastic surgery in the planning and treatment of orthognathic surgical cases.
    Sarver DM; Matukas VJ; Weissman SM
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(4):227-39. PubMed ID: 1820407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical-orthodontic treatment planning for simultaneous mobilization of the maxilla and mandible in the correction of dentofacial deformities.
    Turvey T; Hall DJ; Fish LC; Epker BN
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Nov; 54(5):491-8. PubMed ID: 6960302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery.
    Burstone CJ; James RB; Legan H; Murphy GA; Norton LA
    J Oral Surg; 1978 Apr; 36(4):269-77. PubMed ID: 273073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of new soft tissue software in orthognathic surgery planning.
    Marchetti C; Bianchi A; Muyldermans L; Di Martino M; Lancellotti L; Sarti A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 40(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21030211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Esthetic treatment planning for orthognathic surgery.
    Arnett GW; Gunson MJ
    J Clin Orthod; 2010 Mar; 44(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 20575322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soft tissue response and facial symmetry after orthognathic surgery.
    Wermker K; Kleinheinz J; Jung S; Dirksen D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):e339-45. PubMed ID: 24529350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facial soft-tissue changes in skeletal Class III orthognathic surgery patients analyzed with 3-dimensional laser scanning.
    Baik HS; Kim SY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 20691358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.