BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11495103)

  • 1. The scientific basis for selecting surgical sutures.
    Lin KY; Farinholt HM; Reddy VR; Edlich RF; Rodeheaver GT
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2001; 11(1-2):29-40. PubMed ID: 11495103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture.
    Rodeheaver GT; Beltran KA; Green CW; Faulkner BC; Stiles BM; Stanimir GW; Traeland H; Fried GM; Brown HC; Edlich RF
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1996; 6(3-4):181-98. PubMed ID: 10167360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of glycomer 631 monofilament sutures in closing musculoaponeurotic incisions.
    Rodeheaver GT; Salopek LS; Green CW; Foresman PA; Suber F; Neal JG; Edlich RF
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1998; 8(3-4):225-31. PubMed ID: 10186968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical performance of a braided absorbable suture.
    Faulkner BC; Gear AJ; Hellewell TB; Mazzarese PM; Watkins FH; Edlich RF
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1996; 6(3-4):169-79. PubMed ID: 10167359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical performance of polyglycolic acid and polyglactin 910 synthetic absorbable sutures.
    Rodeheaver GT; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Dec; 153(6):835-41. PubMed ID: 6272438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A biomechanical analysis of suture materials and their influence on a four-strand flexor tendon repair.
    Lawrence TM; Davis TR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 30(4):836-41. PubMed ID: 16039381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative evaluation of 9-0 monofilament and 9-0 braid polyglactin 910 in cataract surgery (intracapsular, extracapsular, and phacoemulsification).
    Blaydes JE; Berry J
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1979 Dec; 10(12):49-54. PubMed ID: 523064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Prolene and vicryl as synthetic sutures for intradermal suture technics].
    Knote G; Bohmert H
    Fortschr Med; 1978 Feb; 96(6):276-80. PubMed ID: 340370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of a new polypropylene suture with Prolene.
    Chu CC; Pratt L; Zhang L; Hsu A; Chu A
    J Appl Biomater; 1993; 4(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 10148624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Vascular microsutures with resorbable and nonresorbable sutures. A comparative study].
    Vasquez G; Mascoli F; Rubbini M; Pollinzi V; Ortolani M; Occhionorelli S; Donini A; Navarra G; Bresadola V; Romano D
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 1991 May; 39(5):177-84. PubMed ID: 1659675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abdominal wound closure using a new polypropylene monofilament suture.
    Hermann RE
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1974 Jan; 138(1):84-6. PubMed ID: 4271821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Suture materials: the abdominal wall].
    Damiani S; Compagno G; Scarpa G; Scalici F; Li Volsi F
    Minerva Chir; 1992 Apr; 47(8):761-4. PubMed ID: 1534878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of coated and uncoated polyglactin 910 in cataract and muscle surgery.
    Blaydes JE; Berry J
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1980 Nov; 11(11):790-3. PubMed ID: 7005799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of 9-0 polyglycolic acid and polyglactin suture in rabbit limbal wounds.
    Sugar A
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1980 May; 11(5):335-7. PubMed ID: 6247679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Monofilament absorbable sutures].
    Knoop M; Keck H
    Zentralbl Chir; 1990; 115(20):1339-42. PubMed ID: 2126160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An innovative absorbable coating for the polybutester suture.
    Rodeheaver GT; Shimer AL; Boyd LM; Drake DB; Edlich RF
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2001; 11(1-2):41-54. PubMed ID: 11495104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study on biocompatibility and absorption times of three absorbable monofilament suture materials (Polydioxanone, Poliglecaprone 25, Glycomer 631).
    Molea G; Schonauer F; Bifulco G; D'Angelo D
    Br J Plast Surg; 2000 Mar; 53(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 10878837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative analysis of the biomechanical behaviour of five flexor tendon core sutures.
    Viinikainen A; Göransson H; Huovinen K; Kellomäki M; Rokkanen P
    J Hand Surg Br; 2004 Dec; 29(6):536-43. PubMed ID: 15542212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A temporary nontoxic lubricant for a synthetic absorbable suture.
    Rodeheaver GT; Foresman PA; Brazda MT; Edlich RF
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Jan; 164(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 3541257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcutaneous incorporation of nonabsorbable monofilament sutures.
    Gittes RF; Foreman R
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Jun; 166(6):545-8. PubMed ID: 2967554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.