These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11495121)

  • 1. The myth of ballistic processing: evidence from Stroop's paradigm.
    Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Jun; 8(2):324-30. PubMed ID: 11495121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A confluence of contexts: asymmetric versus global failures of selective attention to stroop dimensions.
    Sabri M; Melara RD; Algom D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11424642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unconsciously controlled processing: the Stroop effect reconsidered.
    Besner D; Stolz JA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Sep; 6(3):449-55. PubMed ID: 12198783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examining the time course of prime effects on Stroop processing.
    Koch C; Brown JM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Aug; 79(1 Pt 2):675-87. PubMed ID: 7808909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference.
    Lindsay DS; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 8189189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stroop phenomena in the Japanese language: the case of ideographic characters (kanji) and syllabic characters (kana).
    Morikawa Y
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Aug; 53(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 7290886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of stroop interference on the categorical perception of color.
    Wiggett JA; Davies IR
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 18426057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.
    Dunbar K; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Oct; 10(5):622-39. PubMed ID: 6238123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stroop interference and negative priming in patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Vitkovitch M; Bishop S; Dancey C; Richards A
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(9):1570-6. PubMed ID: 11985838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.
    Cho YS; Lien MC; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):826-39. PubMed ID: 16846282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional connectivity during Stroop task performance.
    Harrison BJ; Shaw M; Yücel M; Purcell R; Brewer WJ; Strother SC; Egan GF; Olver JS; Nathan PJ; Pantelis C
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 15588609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When the visual format of the color carrier word does and does not modulate the stroop effect.
    Blais C; Besner D
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1337-44. PubMed ID: 16615381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Color priming affects Stroop interference.
    McClain L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Apr; 56(2):643-51. PubMed ID: 6866673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task.
    Entel O; Tzelgov J; Bereby-Meyer Y; Shahar N
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):913-27. PubMed ID: 25420632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactions between color and word processing in a flanker task.
    Henik A; Ro T; Merrill D; Rafal R; Safadi Z
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Feb; 25(1):198-209. PubMed ID: 10069032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic perception and synaesthesia: evidence from colour and photism naming in a stroop-negative priming task.
    Lupiáñez J; Callejas A
    Cortex; 2006 Feb; 42(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 16683494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpreting Stroop interference: an analysis of differences between task versions.
    Salo R; Henik A; Robertson LC
    Neuropsychology; 2001 Oct; 15(4):462-71. PubMed ID: 11761035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms.
    O'Leary MJ; Barber PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):830-44. PubMed ID: 8409861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.
    Glaser MO; Glaser WR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Dec; 8(6):875-94. PubMed ID: 6218237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.
    Manwell LA; Roberts MA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Jun; 11(3):458-62. PubMed ID: 15376795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.