256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11495142)
1. Clinical evaluation of 3 techniques to augment keratinized tissue without root coverage.
Harris RJ
J Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 72(7):932-8. PubMed ID: 11495142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Molina GO; Souza SL; Taba M; Grisi MF
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1477-84. PubMed ID: 11759858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of 2 techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions.
Cordioli G; Mortarino C; Chierico A; Grusovin MG; Majzoub Z
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1470-6. PubMed ID: 11759857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Width of keratinized tissue after gingivoplasty of healed subepithelial connective tissue grafts.
Maurer S; Hayes C; Leone C
J Periodontol; 2000 Nov; 71(11):1729-36. PubMed ID: 11128921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes.
de Souza SL; Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Taba M; Grisi MF; de Andrade PF
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 10(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 18714934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of root coverage obtained with an acellular dermal matrix versus a connective tissue graft: results of 107 recession defects in 50 consecutively treated patients.
Harris RJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Feb; 20(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11203548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictable multiple site root coverage using an acellular dermal matrix allograft.
Henderson RD; Greenwell H; Drisko C; Regennitter FJ; Lamb JW; Mehlbauer MJ; Goldsmith LJ; Rebitski G
J Periodontol; 2001 May; 72(5):571-82. PubMed ID: 11394391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acellular dermal matrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part 1. A clinical study.
Wei PC; Laurell L; Geivelis M; Lingen MW; Maddalozzo D
J Periodontol; 2000 Aug; 71(8):1297-305. PubMed ID: 10972645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment of multiple areas of gingival recession using a simple harvesting technique for autogenous connective tissue graft.
McLeod DE; Reyes E; Branch-Mays G
J Periodontol; 2009 Oct; 80(10):1680-7. PubMed ID: 19792859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.
Paolantonio M
J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in gingival dimensions following connective tissue grafts for root coverage: comparison of two procedures.
Han JS; John V; Blanchard SB; Kowolik MJ; Eckert GJ
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1346-54. PubMed ID: 18672983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
McGuire MK; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A short-term and long-term comparison of root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix and a subepithelial graft.
Harris RJ
J Periodontol; 2004 May; 75(5):734-43. PubMed ID: 15212356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subpedicle acellular dermal matrix graft and autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: a comparative 1-year clinical study.
Paolantonio M; Dolci M; Esposito P; D'Archivio D; Lisanti L; Di Luccio A; Perinetti G
J Periodontol; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1299-307. PubMed ID: 12479634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Root coverage of advanced gingival recession: a comparative study between acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue grafts.
Tal H; Moses O; Zohar R; Meir H; Nemcovsky C
J Periodontol; 2002 Dec; 73(12):1405-11. PubMed ID: 12546089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Esthetic and dimensional evaluation of free connective tissue grafts in prosthetically treated patients: a 1-year clinical study.
Orsini M; Orsini G; Benlloch D; Aranda JJ; Lázaro P; Sanz M
J Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 75(3):470-7. PubMed ID: 15088886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subgingival acellular dermal matrix allograft for the treatment of gingival recession: a case report.
Tal H
J Periodontol; 1999 Sep; 70(9):1118-24. PubMed ID: 10505815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft.
Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Moses O
J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15152826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative clinical evaluation of acellular dermal matrix allograft and connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Rahmani ME; Lades MA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 May; 7(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 16685296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical microscope may enhance root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.
Bittencourt S; Del Peloso Ribeiro E; Sallum EA; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
J Periodontol; 2012 Jun; 83(6):721-30. PubMed ID: 21870975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
