174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11496284)
1. Simple geometric characteristics fail to reliably predict abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stresses.
Hua J; Mower WR
J Vasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 34(2):308-15. PubMed ID: 11496284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of wall calcifications in patient-specific wall stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Speelman L; Bohra A; Bosboom EM; Schurink GW; van de Vosse FN; Makaorun MS; Vorp DA
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 17227104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A simple method of estimating the stress acting on a bilaterally symmetric abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Yamada H; Hasegawa Y
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2007 Feb; 10(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 18651271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical stresses in abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of diameter, asymmetry, and material anisotropy.
RodrÃguez JF; Ruiz C; Doblaré M; Holzapfel GA
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021023. PubMed ID: 18412510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fluid structure interaction of patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison with solid stress models.
Leung JH; Wright AR; Cheshire N; Crane J; Thom SA; Hughes AD; Xu Y
Biomed Eng Online; 2006 May; 5():33. PubMed ID: 16712729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness.
Scotti CM; Shkolnik AD; Muluk SC; Finol EA
Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Nov; 4():64. PubMed ID: 16271141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A biomechanics-based rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm risk assessment: demonstrative application.
Vande Geest JP; Di Martino ES; Bohra A; Makaroun MS; Vorp DA
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Nov; 1085():11-21. PubMed ID: 17182918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue.
Di Martino ES; Bohra A; Vande Geest JP; Gupta N; Makaroun MS; Vorp DA
J Vasc Surg; 2006 Mar; 43(3):570-6; discussion 576. PubMed ID: 16520175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk.
Fillinger MF; Raghavan ML; Marra SP; Cronenwett JL; Kennedy FE
J Vasc Surg; 2002 Sep; 36(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 12218986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peak wall stress does not necessarily predict the location of rupture in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Georgakarakos E; Ioannou CV; Papaharilaou Y; Kostas T; Tsetis D; Katsamouris AN
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Mar; 39(3):302-4. PubMed ID: 20005751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Raghavan ML; Vorp DA; Federle MP; Makaroun MS; Webster MW
J Vasc Surg; 2000 Apr; 31(4):760-9. PubMed ID: 10753284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms. The role of computational mechanics].
Giannoglou G; Giannakoulas G; Hatzitolios AI; Rudolf J
Herz; 2008 Jul; 33(5):354-61. PubMed ID: 18773155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Importance of initial stress for abdominal aortic aneurysm wall motion: dynamic MRI validated finite element analysis.
Merkx MA; van 't Veer M; Speelman L; Breeuwer M; Buth J; van de Vosse FN
J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2369-73. PubMed ID: 19665127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of abdominal aortic aneurysms: image-based wall thickness distribution.
Martufi G; Di Martino ES; Amon CH; Muluk SC; Finol EA
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Jun; 131(6):061015. PubMed ID: 19449969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wall stress and flow dynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms: finite element analysis vs. fluid-structure interaction.
Scotti CM; Jimenez J; Muluk SC; Finol EA
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2008 Jun; 11(3):301-22. PubMed ID: 18568827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of diameter, wall stress, and rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction.
Maier A; Gee MW; Reeps C; Pongratz J; Eckstein HH; Wall WA
Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Oct; 38(10):3124-34. PubMed ID: 20480238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A numerical implementation to predict residual strains from the homogeneous stress hypothesis with application to abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Polzer S; Bursa J; Gasser TC; Staffa R; Vlachovsky R
Ann Biomed Eng; 2013 Jul; 41(7):1516-27. PubMed ID: 23386030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting the risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms by utilizing various geometrical parameters: revisiting the diameter criterion.
Giannoglou G; Giannakoulas G; Soulis J; Chatzizisis Y; Perdikides T; Melas N; Parcharidis G; Louridas G
Angiology; 2006; 57(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 17022385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The long-term relationship of wall stress to the natural history of abdominal aortic aneurysms (finite element analysis and other methods).
Fillinger M
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Nov; 1085():22-8. PubMed ID: 17182919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Association Between Geometry and Wall Stress in Emergently Repaired Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.
Chauhan SS; Gutierrez CA; Thirugnanasambandam M; De Oliveira V; Muluk SC; Eskandari MK; Finol EA
Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Aug; 45(8):1908-1916. PubMed ID: 28444478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
